One does not have to "see God" or some miracle in order to believe.Why wouldn't empirical evidence be a factor?
One does not have to "see God" or some miracle in order to believe.Why wouldn't empirical evidence be a factor?
I believe in all of the centuries .. I don't believe in 21st. century revelations from God.You believe in a 7th Century book, I believe in a 21st Century book.
So, what is the evidence?One does not have to "see God" or some miracle in order to believe.
Simple, that which you deny.So, what is the evidence?
well, there were two in 19th Century at least, Husayn Ali Nuri and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, a manifestation of Allah and a Mahdi; possibly others too, Yogananda.I believe in all of the centuries .. I don't believe in 21st. century revelations from God.
..nor do the majority in the world.
History is very interesting, and I see that mankind keeps on repeating the same mistakes.
WWIII is inevitable .. mankind is often violent in their love of wealth.
You claim that religion is the problem .. I see that it is about wealth and power.
That does not establish the truth of their belief. Appeal to numbers fallacy...that major civilisations have sprung up around them.
No .. the asylums are full of people who make claims...well, there were two in 19th Century at least, Husayn Ali Nuri and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad..