Aupmanyav
Be your own guru.
For me, it is that. I do not believe in soul, any second life or an ever-lasting life. We live only once.Is it?
That's not what I understand .. nothing to do with molecules ..
..nor is it about brain transplants.![]()
For me, it is that. I do not believe in soul, any second life or an ever-lasting life. We live only once.Is it?
That's not what I understand .. nothing to do with molecules ..
..nor is it about brain transplants.![]()
I will give you a hug and ask what you feel about this comment when we meet in the other worlds of God.For me, it is that. I do not believe in soul, any second life or an ever-lasting life. We live only once.
It is possible that molecules of our body meet each other somewhere, at sometime.I will give you a hug and ask what you feel about this comment when we meet in the other worlds of God.
Could you be wrong?It is possible that molecules of our body meet each other somewhere, at sometime.
They might be doing so even at this moment.
After all, the exhaled air has molecules which were once part of our bodies.
I think he is certainly not wrong, but it doesn't have a spiritual meaning.Could you be wrong?
Yes, could he accept that he might be wrong about the spirit realm.but it doesn't have a spiritual meaning.
I know that. That is why I said 'they might'. Did not make a categorical statement. Chances are not high, but possibility cannot be ruled out.Could you be wrong?
How do you know? Is it only your belief or can you prove it?I do not have a soul.
I find no evidence for it. No evidence, no belief.How do you know? Is it only your belief or can you prove it?
I do have a soul, that is my belief, I cannot prove it to you...................I do however believe my experiences are a little bit more than just fairy tales....![]()
You see no evidence for a Creator, no matter the creation before your eyes?I find no evidence for it. No evidence, no belief.
You accept that you have a soul, but cannot prove it to me or even to yourself.
It is a personal view, a faith based on what people/religions say or a superstition.
Having discerned that you hold to a position that you cannot prove and that @Aupmanyav holds to a position that he cannot prove, nevertheless you seem intent on trying to convince him that he is wrong and that you are right. Might it not be better, and more in the spirit of an interfaith forum, to simply acknowledge that you two are not in agreement on this issue and move on from there?You see no evidence for a Creator, no matter the creation before your eyes?
If you used different words... if instead of creation you said "the reality in front of you" ... Would that call for a different conclusion?You see no evidence for a Creator, no matter the creation before your eyes?
I do not assume anything. Not even that I will live to see this post on Interfaith. Who knows? I have not yet clicked 'Post Reply'.The assumption that anything that IS must have a prior cause is not proven. Purement logically, there's no logical proof that the assumption is wrong but it is logically evident that under the axiom that the assumption is universally true, there cannot be a final reason of all.
That's my point, actually.What logic says that an assumption is universally true? And that there cannot be a final reason of all?