Hello Niblo, great to hear from you, I hope you are well and happy.
I am not able to answer your question in any academic way but to offer what Baha'u'llah offered. There is a Tablet that was translated by Shoghi Effendi, and Julian Coal has done further translations at this link.
Translation by Shoghi Effendi, completed by Cole. Themes include Islamic mysticism and the meaning of detachment, the meaning of the hadith about knowing one's self, the meaning of Return, and the hadith 'The believer is alive in both worlds.'
bahai-library.com
From what I understand it is about knowing one's own self, knowing the image we are made in.
An extract from the Link, that Tablet is;
"He who knoweth his self hath known his Lord (Man ‘arafa nafsahú faqad ‘arafa Rabbahú): A commentary by Bahá'u'lláh
translated by Shoghi Effendi and Juan Cole
1996
I will highlight in bold and put my thoughts in brackets.
"....For in all things is present and visible the sign of the effulgence of the self-subsistent Glory and the rays of the manifestation of the unique Sun. This sign is not and never shall be confined to any one soul. This is the truth, and no doubt lies therein, if you be among those who know. But the primary intent of knowing the self in this station is the knowledge of the
Self of God (the Messengers) in every era and age. For the pre-existent essence and the ocean of reality is exalted above the knowledge of all else but Him (the knowledgeof the Messenger). Therefore, the insight attained by all the mystics actually hath reference to their insight into the Manifestations of His Cause. They are the
Self of God among His servants, His Manifestation in His Creation, His Sign among His creatures. Whoso knoweth them hath known god, whoso hath affirmed them hath affirmed God, whoso hath acknowledged Their truth hath acknowledged the signs of God, the Help in Peril, the Everlasting. Thus do We reveal for you the signs, that you might be guided by the Signs of God..."
This Tablet has much mystical thought, the end of the Tablet gives much promise for our own selves, when we embrace the "Self of God".
Regards Tony
Hi Tony. I’m fine, thanks. I trust it’s the same with you.
I have a copy of the Kitáb-i-Íqán (‘The Book of Certitude’) written, as you will know, by Baháʼu'lláh (known by the Official Website of the Worldwide Bahá’í Community as: ‘Baháʼu'lláh – The Divine Educator’).
Baháʼu'lláh writes:
Briefly, there hath been revealed in the Kitáb-i-Íqán concerning the Presence and Revelation of God that which will suffice the fair-minded.’ (‘Epistle to the Son of the Wolf’).
In his foreword to the Íqán, Shoghi Effendi – the translator – writes:
‘This is one more attempt to introduce to the West, in language however inadequate, this book of
unsurpassed pre-eminence among the writings of the Author of the Bahá’í Revelation. The hope is that it may assist others in their efforts to approach what must always be regarded as the unattainable goal—a befitting rendering of Bahá’u’lláh’s matchless utterance.’ (My emphasis).
An important work, then.
In Part One of the Íqán, Baháʼu'lláh writes:
‘As to the matter of names, Muḥammad, Himself, declared: “I am Jesus.”’
Nowhere in the Qur’an does Allāh (subḥānahu ūta'āla) refer to the Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) as ‘Jesus’.
Nowhere in the Qur’an does the Prophet as refer to himself ‘Jesus’.
Nowhere in the ʼaḥādīth does the Prophet refer to himself as ‘Jesus’.
Baháʼu'lláh is in grave error; or else he is lying.
How do you square this with your belief that Baháʼu'lláh is a ‘
Self of God His Manifestation in His Creation, His Sign among His creatures’?
Over the years I have had many conversations with the Bahá’í – including yourself. I have been told, repeatedly, that the Bahá’í revere the Qur’an.
Shoghi Effendi writes:
‘As to Muhammad, the Apostle of God, let none among His followers who read these pages, think for a moment that either Islám, or its Prophet, or His Book, or His appointed Successors, or any of His authentic teachings, have been, or are to be in any way, or to however slight a degree, disparaged………the arguments adduced, forcibly, fearlessly, and publicly by `Abdu'l-Bahá, in churches and synagogues, to demonstrate the validity of the Message of the Arabian Prophet……….. all proclaim, in no uncertain terms, the true attitude of the Bahá'í Faith towards its parent religion.’( ‘ The Promised Day Is Come’).
Make no mistake, Tony, the ‘true attitude of the Bahá'í Faith towards its parent religion’ is to accept what they like, and reject what they please.
In Part One Íqán, Baháʼu'lláh writes:
‘In like manner, when the hour of the Revelation of Jesus drew nigh, a few of the Magi, aware that the star of Jesus had appeared in heaven, sought and followed it, till they came unto the city which was the seat of the Kingdom of Herod. The sway of his sovereignty in those days embraced the whole of that land.
‘These Magi said: “Where is He that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east and are come to worship Him!”48 When they had searched, they found out that in Bethlehem, in the land of Judea, the Child had been born. This was the sign that was manifested in the visible heaven.’
A clear reference to the nativity, according to Matthew.
However, Allāh (subḥānahu ūta'āla) says:
‘And so it was ordained: she (Mary) conceived him. She withdrew to a distant place and, when the pains of childbirth drove her to (cling to) the trunk of a palm tree, she exclaimed, ‘I wish I had been dead and forgotten long before all this!’....., ('Maryam:22-23).
If we accept the Gospel nativity account (and Baháʼu'lláh clearly does; for why else would he quote it?), then we must reject the Qur’an’s (and vice versa, of course). The Bahá’í cannot have it both ways. The narratives are mutually exclusive.
Baháʼu'lláh continues:
‘Likewise, reflect upon the state and condition of Mary. So deep was the perplexity of that most beauteous countenance, so grievous her case, that she bitterly regretted she had ever been born. To this beareth witness the text of the sacred verse wherein it is mentioned that
after Mary had given birth to Jesus, she bemoaned her plight and cried out: “O would that I had died ere this, and been a thing forgotten, forgotten quite!” (My emphasis).
As you can see from the above ʾāyāt, Mary (Radi Allahu ‘anha)’s lament occurred
during her labour, and not after it.
You might be forgiven for thinking that Baháʼu'lláh (a ‘
Self of God His Manifestation in His Creation, His Sign among His creatures’?) should have known this.
In Part Two of the Iqán, Baháʼu'lláh writes:
‘Thus hath Ṣádiq,
son of Muḥammad, spoken: “God verily will test them and sift them.” This is the divine standard, this is the Touchstone of God, wherewith He proveth His servants.’ (My emphasis).
The Prophet (sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallam) had only three sons (Qasim; Abdullah; and Ibrahim). All three died in infancy.
Was Baháʼu'lláh not aware of this; or, being aware, why does he lie?
How do you square this with your belief that Baháʼu'lláh is a ‘
Self of God His Manifestation in His Creation, His Sign among His creatures’?
Blessings.