What evidence would you accept?

Exclusivity.
Don't tribes and nations tend to be exclusive?
It's part of our reality .. I see that religion is able to break through that tribal barrier.
..as are political ideologies.

You seem to see religion as the main culprit .. and do not consider the political
differences between parties as being the main reason for conflict.
Of course, our beliefs are often connected with our political views.

One example would be the dislike of communist regimes who oppressed Abrahamic religion
in the past.
Political ideologies often clash .. some people like G-d .. and some people like Karl Marx etc.
 
Peace to all,

The logical function of the God from The Faith of Abraham is to hypo-statically unite from the spirit through the life.

A jealous God wants fulfilled love in a body unfailing, forever, timelessly, pulsing, dynamically through Family Passion.

Peace always,
Stephen
 
It varies from person to person, as I have said above.
Even if you've said it before, can you given an example? (referring to evidence)
There's no universally accepted standard for evidence then - naturally then you run into disputes there and no way to resolve them.
Clearly, whole civilisations are based on the Bible and/or Qur'an .. and are the most populous
beliefs worldwide.
Does the population size matter in the context of evidence for beliefs?
 
Last edited:
There's no universally accepted standard for evidence then..
I think there is .. legal systems employ them.

- naturally then you run into disputes there and no way to resolve them..
Where there is a will, there is a way.

Does the population size matter in the context of evidence for beliefs?
What do you mean matter?
Is it significant? I would say yes.
Does it translate to being the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Not necessarily.
 
Back
Top