I find it difficult to truly formulate just what this question is about. Perhaps just a quest for clarity of thought!
I was taken by some words in Eckhart's "Talks of Instruction" where he states........"When we.............strip ourselves of what is ours, then God must enter into us...............when someone wills nothing for themselves, then God must will on their behalf..........." For some reason I find these words slightly disturbing in some vague sense, that no "choice" is involved, that "God" is compelled to act...........as some sort of automaton! The "must"......
I remembered back to some correspondance that Thomas Merton had with Aldous Huxley concerning mystical experience, where Huxley was advocating the use of drugs, and Merton spoke of a "fully mystical experience" as involving, as its very essence, the "contact of two liberties". I find these words suggestive in some way and pointing towards something truly valueable that Eckhart is perhaps missing.
Perhaps this just revolves around whether we understand ultimate reality as being "impersonal" or in some sense "personal". (Perhaps ultimate reality - beyond knowing, thought or concept - will always express itself in/as persons?)
Or again, is this all getting back to the "non-dual" versus "duality".........in a very wide sense, the difference between the theistic and non-theistic faiths, "east" and "west".
Or determinism versus free will?
Sorry if this all seems a bit vague.........not sure just what the question is.
Any contribution will be gratefully received!
I was taken by some words in Eckhart's "Talks of Instruction" where he states........"When we.............strip ourselves of what is ours, then God must enter into us...............when someone wills nothing for themselves, then God must will on their behalf..........." For some reason I find these words slightly disturbing in some vague sense, that no "choice" is involved, that "God" is compelled to act...........as some sort of automaton! The "must"......
I remembered back to some correspondance that Thomas Merton had with Aldous Huxley concerning mystical experience, where Huxley was advocating the use of drugs, and Merton spoke of a "fully mystical experience" as involving, as its very essence, the "contact of two liberties". I find these words suggestive in some way and pointing towards something truly valueable that Eckhart is perhaps missing.
Perhaps this just revolves around whether we understand ultimate reality as being "impersonal" or in some sense "personal". (Perhaps ultimate reality - beyond knowing, thought or concept - will always express itself in/as persons?)
Or again, is this all getting back to the "non-dual" versus "duality".........in a very wide sense, the difference between the theistic and non-theistic faiths, "east" and "west".
Or determinism versus free will?
Sorry if this all seems a bit vague.........not sure just what the question is.
Any contribution will be gratefully received!