Nogodnomasters said:The evidence does support the hypotheis, you just have not seen it. In fact the evidence is so overwhelming and so simple to reproduce I hesitate to write about it until it is published. There is a thread I started just on this topic, if you care to continue the debate there.
as they say in the gambling world.... "show or fold".
if you have evidence to support your theory, then please provide it. you do not need to reveal all your evidence on here, one has no interest in depriving another of a source of income. however.... at this point, your "facts" are not... they are your opinion.