For a long time now I have explored the relationship between Christian and Buddhist experience. One very good guide - for me - has been the Trappist monk Thomas Merton.
Thomas Merton had a deep respect for Buddhism - especially Zen - and always spoke highly of it, even to the point of using examples from Buddhist spirituality to highlight points that appeared unclear within Christianity - at least, as it is generally understood.
Nevertheless, at one or two points in his writings, he has said such things as "of course, Zen redeems nothing". Merton's thought was always on the move and perhaps it eventually evolved beyond such distinctions.................yet he did seem to recognise a distinction between "enlightenment" and "redemption".
How do others here see the distinction between "redemption" and "enlightenment" - if any? I would be pleased to hear and share the understanding of others.
Thank you
"From the rocking of the cradle, to the rolling of the hearse,
The going up was worth the coming down"
From "The Pilgrim"
Thomas Merton had a deep respect for Buddhism - especially Zen - and always spoke highly of it, even to the point of using examples from Buddhist spirituality to highlight points that appeared unclear within Christianity - at least, as it is generally understood.
Nevertheless, at one or two points in his writings, he has said such things as "of course, Zen redeems nothing". Merton's thought was always on the move and perhaps it eventually evolved beyond such distinctions.................yet he did seem to recognise a distinction between "enlightenment" and "redemption".
How do others here see the distinction between "redemption" and "enlightenment" - if any? I would be pleased to hear and share the understanding of others.
Thank you
"From the rocking of the cradle, to the rolling of the hearse,
The going up was worth the coming down"
From "The Pilgrim"