N
Nick_A
Guest
We are making progress in our moral discrimination and gradually outgrowing old fashioned ideas, As you know, the question of abortion has been debated including partial birth abortion where the baby is legally killed because the head has not yet emerged. Here is a description of the process:
Partial Birth Abortion Diagrams
We are still caught up in the debate as to when a baby becomes a baby. But we are now educated enough to make the transition into appreciating the real essence of the debate which is when we have the right to kill.
We kill in wars and executions so why not kill unwanted babies? It seems that this idea of partial birth abortion just confuses the question and prevents real choice.
Would you find a three day grace period acceptable after the birth of a baby within which the mother could have its life terminated. Within three days she should be able to decide if she wants this burden or would perhaps eliminate it as her right of choice.
It is obvious that a baby three days before birth is really the same as a baby three days after birth. So rather make lawyers rich with fighting over late term partial birth abortions in the future, why not just give the mother the right of choice to terminate the baby within three days of its birth?
Of course there are laws against it now but regardless of them, is there any reason why a mother's right of choice should not be extended to three days after birth so that her choice could be made with a clear head? The baby is the same so it doesn't make a difference. It would clear up this problem as to legality and the time within a pregnancy the fetus could be terminated. By extending the right to abortion for three days after birth would really be respecting choice and clear out a lot of read tape and foolish debate.
Is there any reason excluding legality, you would object to the three day grace period after birth within which the baby could be terminated for the sake of the mother and in respect to her choice?
Partial Birth Abortion Diagrams
We are still caught up in the debate as to when a baby becomes a baby. But we are now educated enough to make the transition into appreciating the real essence of the debate which is when we have the right to kill.
We kill in wars and executions so why not kill unwanted babies? It seems that this idea of partial birth abortion just confuses the question and prevents real choice.
Would you find a three day grace period acceptable after the birth of a baby within which the mother could have its life terminated. Within three days she should be able to decide if she wants this burden or would perhaps eliminate it as her right of choice.
It is obvious that a baby three days before birth is really the same as a baby three days after birth. So rather make lawyers rich with fighting over late term partial birth abortions in the future, why not just give the mother the right of choice to terminate the baby within three days of its birth?
Of course there are laws against it now but regardless of them, is there any reason why a mother's right of choice should not be extended to three days after birth so that her choice could be made with a clear head? The baby is the same so it doesn't make a difference. It would clear up this problem as to legality and the time within a pregnancy the fetus could be terminated. By extending the right to abortion for three days after birth would really be respecting choice and clear out a lot of read tape and foolish debate.
Is there any reason excluding legality, you would object to the three day grace period after birth within which the baby could be terminated for the sake of the mother and in respect to her choice?