Christians: Do you accept the supernatural and the miracles of the NT?

Hi All,

Thank you for the answers so far. I came down with a sudden bug yesterday and am still woozy, so not going to write too much more right now.

I see many have addressed the healing miracles and then some of the nature miracles like walking on water.

What about the virgin birth, the Incarnation, and the Resurrection? Those are some of the biggies, I think.

What about the feeding of thousands? Are you tempted to explain it away by saying Jesus got people to be more generous than they were willing at first, so they pulled out what they really had, or do you go for a bona fide intervention of God into our world?

If you believe in God, and if you believe that Jesus was God incarnate, what stops you from accepting the other miracles at face value as described in the Bible?
 
I don't believe in the supernatural, I believe it is all natural.

I don't believe in miracles, I believe it is all a miracle.

these things and greater ye shall do...


wil, you've said such things in the past, and that's all very quaint. But it doesn't really pin down what you believe. Do you mean to say that miracles are natural? If so, why are they so rare, assuming they occur at all noawdays? I suppose you can say that life is a miracle, particularly when you gaze in your newborn's eyes, but life is a scientific construct also. You can follow the biological processes that turn a fertilized egg into a human being and understand somewhat why.

I think the intent of the OP is whether or not to believe in the extraordinary. In this respect it is indeed hard to connect with the biblical examples of miracles. For the most part, you do not see the extraordinary happen on a daily basis, if even at all. That is a struggle for me, though I've met people who have claimed to be healed in extraordinary ways, even a woman who had been blind got her eyesight back in a healing. So what do I know? I was skeptical and I did question her about it, but saw no reason why she would have made it up. But she was afraid that God would cause her to go blind again if she messed up in some way.

Which leads to the question of how miracles and healings operate. As mentioned, one reason would be to establish truth. Certainly something could be said of validation n regards to Jesus as coming from God. But then there are the examples of the Apostles, who've on occasion performed healings and miracles, according to scripture. What truth were they trying to validate? That they were with Jesus and by proxy they were establishing truth? If that is the case, why aren't we able to replicate them. Or are we supposed to replicate them? But if we don't replicate them, or aren't supposed to, then does that throw doubt on the ones that have been written about in scripture?

Several factors to consider when considering biblical miracles:

1.As aforementioned, miracles were performed to establish truth, or validity. Jesus said He was from God and miracles were a sign.

2. However, miracles weren't so much to establish truth as much as to show compassion. Jesus genuinely cared for those who suffered or was in need.

3. Miracles cannot be performed if there is lack of belief. The scriptures say that when Jesus came to his hometown He didn't many miracles because of unbelief. Why? Because of pride. People who knew him just couldn't come to terms that He was from God, or represented God's truth. And that leads naturally to skepticism that could heal and hence not many would seek Him out.

4. By the same token, the the one seeking healing must have the faith in the believe that they can be healed. Take the woman with the issue of blood. Jesus wasn't even aware of her, yet virtue went out of him and healed her. In this case, the intermediar's knowledge wasn't necessary. Somehow, Jesus was a conduit for God's power to work of that woman.

5. Which leads me to believe that miracles are a three-way street. A cooperative effort between the healer and the one being healed and God. And to conclude as a further kicker that the healing power didn't come Jesus or the Apostles, for it is God that has the power to heal. Jesus was only an intermediatary of that power. But for a miracle or healing to occur, there has to enabler of the part of Jesus and the one seeking the healing, yet any power to heal comes as a result of compassion.

6. This kind comes not without fasting and prayer. The Apostles weren't able to see a man healed. Why fasting and prayer? Prayer is a enabler to bring us into a right relationship with God. Our hearts need to be made right, lest we boast in our own abilities or even boast in our relationship with God. Our spiritual state needs to be revitalized in order that God through the Spirit can work in us. Fasting is a method of self-denial. When we suffer hunger, we feel the need, we realize our limitations in the flesh, weak and therefore needy. We can sympathize with the hungry, for we feel it ourselves (Isaiah 58 has much to say about this fasting). Jesus rose up and prayed early in the morning and probaly late into the evening. I'm sure He fasted often as well, and not just the 40 days at the beginning of His ministry.

7. Strength in numbers. I believe God hears collective prayer. I think God moves by collective prayer, especially if everyone involved has consecrated their hearts toward God. But perhaps a hinderance is that someone or some are not in that right state and it is effecting how that prayer is being answered. Is their sin in the camp?

8. We must remember that we live in a fallen world. We are all going to die one day. And our time on earth is but a blip in the annals of human history in the grand scheme of things. All we can hope for in any healing is a delay. Lazarus, even being resurrected for a time, eventually died...again. So in contemplation, one must ask, how would a divine healing or miracle affect you as a person? What would you do if God granted a delay? Hezakiah was allowed another 15 more years to live.

9. God is sovereign. Miracles or healings are not intended for everyone. The Canaanite woman who came to Jesus for her vexed daughter was initially denied, since Jesus came but for the lost sheep of Israel. Yet the woman pressed Him, and He eventually relented. Which says something about persistence (Luke 18:1-8). Do you dare to challenge God for what you are praying for? Do you believe God can change His mind?

All I'm trying to point out here is that there are many factors involved when it comes to miracles and healings. And I think a lot has do with the alignment of conditions before one can take place. It is not a guarantee and it will probably involve deeper spiritual implications on the part of all those involved beyond the mere thought of getting healed or seeing some miracle happen for its own sake. And perhaps Christians eagerness to see miracles and healings for their own sake, particularly in Charismatic and Pentacostal circles, is part of the reason that most never happen. Any preacher offers such either doesn't know what he's doing or is full of sh!t. Any believer that seeks after such ought to know this also.

I believe miracles to be the exception, rather than the rule. I believe for the most part that life will progress in its natural course. But I also believe that on occasion God does work a healing there, a miracle there. But He does so to influence change in the spiritual condition of those involved or who witnesses it.

But there are smaller miracles that don't happen on a grand scale, and maybe this is what wil is speaking of. I've seen some unusual coincidences happen that I don't often comprehend. Quirks in my own life that seem to occur or notice when I've been in a spiritual state of harmony with God's will. Slight things that are sometimes remarkable. Things seem to follow a certain way, I can't explain it fully. Is it because I'm paying more attention while being in tune, or do these things happen because I'm in tune? Or maybe someone else is in tune? Or is everyone in tune?

Sorry to blather on. Sometimes I don't know how long I've been rambling on in these posts.
 
If you believe in God, and if you believe that Jesus was God incarnate, what stops you from accepting the other miracles at face value as described in the Bible?

I think that they all happened, just as it has been recorded in the Bible. Why not? God created the Earth; parting the Red Sea is child's play in comparison, yeah? God created the human body; how difficult would it be to create a baby inside of Mary's womb?
 
Sorry to intrude. I promise not to turn into a troll.

Do you mean to say that miracles are natural?

In order to determine whether they have a natural origin or not there must be some kind of investigation, either of the event itself or of evidence left over from the event.

There are plenty of people who do not believe that an old Earth is natural even though there is plenty of evidence in the form of fossils, geology, atomic decay, shifting magnetic fields, cosmology, etc.

So what evidence do you have of miracles?

which leads to the next question...

If so, why are they so rare, assuming they occur at all noawdays?

Indeed, why are miracles so rare? They seemed to occur with great regularity just a few thousand years ago. One might explain that God is testing our faith, but the most logical explanation is that they never occurred in the first place.

What conditions changed that suddenly put an end to these miracles? I would suggest it was a greater understanding of the natural world. The more we understand, the fewer miracles manifest.

What is your explanation for that?
 
wil, you've said such things in the past, and that's all very quaint. But it doesn't really pin down what you believe. Do you mean to say that miracles are natural? If so, why are they so rare, assuming they occur at all noawdays? I suppose you can say that life is a miracle, particularly when you gaze in your newborn's eyes, but life is a scientific construct also. You can follow the biological processes that turn a fertilized egg into a human being and understand somewhat why.
Are they rare?

Have you read any books by MDs on healings that have occurred outside of their medical understanding? Or on autopsies that indicate cancer, heart disease that healed itself without medical intervention?

How about the Northern Lights, is that rare, does that make it a miracle? Of course it was at one time, so was the rainbow...rare, but when conditions are right normal...or is it G!d saying he'll never flood the earth again?

I've watched the arthritic walk, with miraculous healing, no, with natural healing. Accupunture, poo poo-ed (actual term) by science and medicine for years...miraculous or quackery? oops NIH now admits, insurance pays for, healing via chakras and meridians using a life force that can't be seen. Miraculous or Natural...what we don't understand we called miraculous...how quaint.
 
the word of Scripture as being in any sense 'reliable' or 'authentic' or 'genuine', but all a fabricated construct.
Of course It could in fact be totally authentic and genuine without being literal.

But maybe we're losing sight of the essential.... If all of Creation is one big miracle, what's wrong with a few small ones here and there?
 
Have you read any books by MDs on healings that have occurred outside of their medical understanding? Or on autopsies that indicate cancer, heart disease that healed itself without medical intervention?

Why is this considered a miracle? Give one million people cancer and a few are bound to survive it even without medical intervention. Does that make them miracles or statistical outcomes?

I remember a news story a year or so ago where two window washers in New York fell about 50 stories. One lived, one died. Was it a miracle? Why was it a miracle for one but not the other?

In my ESPN Magazine there was a short story about former race car driver Cale Yarborough. He was skydiving when his parachute failed to open at 2000 feet. He fell into mud and tall weeds and lived. Drop a million people from the same height and some small percentage will survive.

No miracles necessary.
 
Just to clarify, by miracle I am referring to Divine intervention, not just things that are improbable.
It does help to specify criteria. But how would you or I or anyone else tell the difference?

As an aside, the Church requires two miracles to declare someone a saint.
 
Just to clarify, by miracle I am referring to Divine intervention, not just things that are improbable.
Even better.

People want to find reasons for events because the notion of randomness is too frightening.

People want to believe "Everything happens for a reason".

I am content with "Everything happens".
 
People want to believe "Everything happens for a reason".

I am content with "Everything happens".

People want to believe...? You do believe in the Scriptures don't you? Otherwise why are you here?

"To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die ... a time to kill, and a time to heal..." (Ecc. 3:1-3).

I fact if anyone doesn't believe in the Scriptures why indeed are they even here?

Do you know Jesus performed even more miracles than you can ever know?
 
People want to believe...? You do believe in the Scriptures don't you? Otherwise why are you here?

"To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die ... a time to kill, and a time to heal..." (Ecc. 3:1-3).

I fact if anyone doesn't believe in the Scriptures why indeed are they even here?

Do you know Jesus performed even more miracles than you can ever know?

Now now, citizenzen has been quite polite. No need to badger him!
 
Why is this considered a miracle? Give one million people cancer and a few are bound to survive it even without medical intervention. Does that make them miracles or statistical outcomes?

I remember a news story a year or so ago where two window washers in New York fell about 50 stories. One lived, one died. Was it a miracle? Why was it a miracle for one but not the other?

No miracles necessary.
Again, my point there are no miracles and it is all a miracle.

That's a good point. That is why I asked about the virign birth, incarnation and resurrection.
Namaste Luna,

Ah divine intervention. We now know there is no virgin birth in the bible the words translated later to virgin referred to maiden and young woman...seems this will be argued forever. We know some deny the siblings of Jesus just to keep Mary a virgin forever, the fight goes on.

Divine intervention, the lord parted the red sea, big deal that it was and then brought the sea back and drowned the Egyptians... So we've got apologists fighting to whether it was an meteoroligical phenomena or a mistranslation and meant the reed sea and they just got stuck in the mud...what? I thought G!D seperated the seas miraculously...no it appears it was a story, but that doesn't stop the value of the metaphor to me.

We know we were at a time when there were many competing religions (like today) and we had to prove that our G!d was better than your G!D (like today) So our G!D is better than all your gods...you got Posiedon? We can part the waters, you got a virgin birth, we've got one too, you got healings, we got that, you got a resurection, we've got all that and more and three G!ds in one, and they can do it all...so there!

What if they came up with a religion that didn't have all the bells and whistles of the other...what would we write home to mom that we joined?

Yes, Thomas, all this from a Christian who is currently starting on another lenten journey...four readings and contemplations a day...and loving every word in the scripture. Today was Matt 5:1-16...I chose 'The Message' to read...it was like a brand new reading of the beatatudes...love the beginning...
When Jesus saw his ministry drawing huge crowds, he climbed a hillside. Those who were apprenticed to him, the committed, climbed with him. Arriving at a quiet place, he sat down and taught his climbing companions. This is what he said:
Are we just following along and reading what was given and declaring it all truth...or are we committed, taking the higher path and sitting down and listening to the essence of our elder brother and wayshower?

and the end of the reading
"Here's another way to put it: You're here to be light, bringing out the God-colors in the world. God is not a secret to be kept. We're going public with this, as public as a city on a hill. If I make you light-bearers, you don't think I'm going to hide you under a bucket, do you? I'm putting you on a light stand. Now that I've put you there on a hilltop, on a light stand—shine! Keep open house; be generous with your lives. By opening up to others, you'll prompt people to open up with God, this generous Father in heaven.
Yup The Message puts it in "Quotes" just like I did, just like the KJV, the NRSV, the NIV, the NKJV...shall I go on...are any of them really "quotes", no it is all conjecture as to what he really said or did.
 
People want to believe...? You do believe in the Scriptures don't you? Otherwise why are you here?

No. No. Please feel free to badger me as much as you like.

And one more "no", I don't believe in the scriptures. Do you believe in the ancient Egyptian Gods? Of course you don't. They hold no meaning to you. Yet for thousands of years people felt as passionately for them as you do your God.

Well, the same way you can look at their religion and shake your head in dismay at their quaint, silly superstitions, I am able to look at your religion and see the exact same thing.
 
Ah divine intervention. We now know there is no virgin birth in the bible the words translated later to virgin referred to maiden and young woman...seems this will be argued forever. We know some deny the siblings of Jesus just to keep Mary a virgin forever, the fight goes on.

I know what you are referring to (Isaiah), but I'm pretty sure both Matthew and Luke discuss the virgin birth of Jesus.
 
No. No. Please feel free to badger me as much as you like.

And one more "no", I don't believe in the scriptures. Do you believe in the ancient Egyptian Gods? Of course you don't. They hold no meaning to you. Yet for thousands of years people felt as passionately for them as you do your God.

Well, the same way you can look at their religion and shake your head in dismay at their quaint, silly superstitions, I am able to look at your religion and see the exact same thing.


your avatar makes sense now. lol
 
I have had a really busy day but my mind was constantly thinking and while I was meditating and studying this afternoon, I had an epiphany..one of those moments of crystal clarity when everything makes sense and come together as an aw..ha! Too tired tonight to write out my moment of Divine Revelation and hopefully, I will remember it tomorrow...:confused:
 
Sorry to intrude. I promise not to turn into a troll.



In order to determine whether they have a natural origin or not there must be some kind of investigation, either of the event itself or of evidence left over from the event.

There are plenty of people who do not believe that an old Earth is natural even though there is plenty of evidence in the form of fossils, geology, atomic decay, shifting magnetic fields, cosmology, etc.

So what evidence do you have of miracles?

which leads to the next question...

I agree, to constitute a miracle of Divine Intervention, there must be no other natural explanation. You typically are not going to see floating axe heads or people walking on water (unless it's ice). So basically, a miracle is a matter of elimination?



Indeed, why are miracles so rare? They seemed to occur with great regularity just a few thousand years ago. One might explain that God is testing our faith, but the most logical explanation is that they never occurred in the first place.

What conditions changed that suddenly put an end to these miracles? I would suggest it was a greater understanding of the natural world. The more we understand, the fewer miracles manifest.

What is your explanation for that?

Another possibility is found in I Corinthians 1:22 when Paul said:

"For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:"

When the Pharisees asked Jesus for a miraculous sign, He said:

"...An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas:
For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." - Matthew 12:38-40

Maybe signs and wonders are primarily for the Jews. And when the Temple was destroyed and the Jews scattered, signs and wonders on a wide scale ceased for a time.
 
Back
Top