N
Nick_A
Guest
The New Testament uses both the words "Neos" meaning new as opposed to old and "Kainos" as unique. Hebrews 12: 24 identifying Jesus Christ as the mediator of the new covenant is the only passage where neos is used. Every other passage uses kainos suggesting "unique." Why is the new covenant unique?
The new covenant is unique because it internalizes the law of God. the Ten Commandments suggest what to do. This is external reaction We've become too hardened so is no longer effective. The new covenant opens the heart to receive help from the Holy Spirit. This is unique.
Israel didn't have the heart or nature to obey God (Deuteronomy 5:29). The old covenant contained no provision for internal motivation to obey God (Hebrews 8:7-8, Romans 8:3). In the new covenant God promises to put His laws into the mind and write them on the heart (Hebrews 8:10). What does this mean?
It is no longer normal from becoming hardened to delight in God's will. Psalm 40:8. It is not what we do: Romans 8:7. The new covenant promises the power to obey God through the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit which is a unique feature of the new covenant.. In short, the Holy spirit allows us to change what we ARE. Where the old is concerned with what we DO, the new is concerned with what we ARE, the change in our nature possible through the help of the Spirit.:
The new covenant renders the old "obsolete" It allows us to transcend our inner condition.that makes the law impossible and become our spiritual potential.
The new covenant suggests the forgiveness of sins through this inner change and eternal inheritance. But without agreeing on the essence of the new covenant and its concern for what we ARE as more important than what we DO, it seems senseless to proceed further So, do we agree as to the necessary distinction between what we ARE and what we DO because of the inner hypocrisy of the "wretched man" and what it denies us?
I've found during my Internet experiences how repulsive this is to the Interfaith mindset because it asserts there is something not right about what we ARE. Recognition of this fact is seen as elitist, condescending, and violence provking and lord knows wh else. Yet to deny it only serves to avoid the human condition and perpetuate the results it will always lead to regardless of platitudes.
So, believing that the New Covenant has value both for individuality and its beneficial effects within society, regardless of the growls, I believe it is worthwhile posting it for anyone to ponder.
Hebrews 8:
1The point of what we are saying is this: We do have such a high priest, who sat down at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven, 2and who serves in the sanctuary, the true tabernacle set up by the Lord, not by man.
3Every high priest is appointed to offer both gifts and sacrifices, and so it was necessary for this one also to have something to offer. 4If he were on earth, he would not be a priest, for there are already men who offer the gifts prescribed by the law. 5They serve at a sanctuary that is a copy and shadow of what is in heaven. This is why Moses was warned when he was about to build the tabernacle: "See to it that you make everything according to the pattern shown you on the mountain."[a] 6But the ministry Jesus has received is as superior to theirs as the covenant of which he is mediator is superior to the old one, and it is founded on better promises.
7For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. 8But God found fault with the people and said:
"The time is coming, declares the Lord,
when I will make a new covenant
with the house of Israel
and with the house of Judah.
9It will not be like the covenant
I made with their forefathers
when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of Egypt,
because they did not remain faithful to my covenant,
and I turned away from them, declares the Lord.
10This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel
after that time, declares the Lord.
I will put my laws in their minds
and write them on their hearts.
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.
11No longer will a man teach his neighbor,
or a man his brother, saying, 'Know the Lord,'
because they will all know me,
from the least of them to the greatest.
12For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more."[c]
13By calling this covenant "new," he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.
The new covenant is unique because it internalizes the law of God. the Ten Commandments suggest what to do. This is external reaction We've become too hardened so is no longer effective. The new covenant opens the heart to receive help from the Holy Spirit. This is unique.
Israel didn't have the heart or nature to obey God (Deuteronomy 5:29). The old covenant contained no provision for internal motivation to obey God (Hebrews 8:7-8, Romans 8:3). In the new covenant God promises to put His laws into the mind and write them on the heart (Hebrews 8:10). What does this mean?
It is no longer normal from becoming hardened to delight in God's will. Psalm 40:8. It is not what we do: Romans 8:7. The new covenant promises the power to obey God through the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit which is a unique feature of the new covenant.. In short, the Holy spirit allows us to change what we ARE. Where the old is concerned with what we DO, the new is concerned with what we ARE, the change in our nature possible through the help of the Spirit.:
The new covenant renders the old "obsolete" It allows us to transcend our inner condition.that makes the law impossible and become our spiritual potential.
The new covenant suggests the forgiveness of sins through this inner change and eternal inheritance. But without agreeing on the essence of the new covenant and its concern for what we ARE as more important than what we DO, it seems senseless to proceed further So, do we agree as to the necessary distinction between what we ARE and what we DO because of the inner hypocrisy of the "wretched man" and what it denies us?
I've found during my Internet experiences how repulsive this is to the Interfaith mindset because it asserts there is something not right about what we ARE. Recognition of this fact is seen as elitist, condescending, and violence provking and lord knows wh else. Yet to deny it only serves to avoid the human condition and perpetuate the results it will always lead to regardless of platitudes.
So, believing that the New Covenant has value both for individuality and its beneficial effects within society, regardless of the growls, I believe it is worthwhile posting it for anyone to ponder.