S
Enemy for eternity. USA will never find peace ever again. USA's governement failed on history class.BluejayWay said:The United States is led by an ideological cabal with a strong Apocalyptic current coursing through its veins--as incredible a misuse of religious feeling and sybology as the radical Islam that they have made our enemiy.
i suppose that i don't see the issue. each person is responsible for their own actions, e.g. the actions which they intend. they are, if you will, the seeds that we plant in our own garden. nobody else reaps the fruit of the seeds that we plant. in short, Buddhist interdependence isn't the same as understood in Western materialists philosophies.Sacredstar said:How do you reconcile the difference between being responsible for one's own actions and also being interdependent of each other?
this would more properly be a Sanatan Dharma view (Hindu). Buddhism does not posit that there is a single, collective consciousness from which our individual consciousnesses are part.E.g we are all ONE in group consciousness, so what the individual chooses then impacts like a pebble in the pond reverberating out much further afield.
karma is created on an individual level, a group level, a city level, a country level and a world level. karma is intentional action. if a large group of people all commit the same intentional action, that creates "group" karma for them. however, each being therein does not reap the fruit of their shared karma the same, as this is a function of several other factors and is mitigated by ones' praxis.Creating not only individual karma but also group/country karma?
she has a family with a food allergy which she's unaware of?Another analogy a mother buys the food with her best intent, but yet her family are allergic to this food and they become very ill?
Who is responsible for the family and the ill-health of the community that she shares?
it depends on how you mean this. remember, in the Buddhist teachings, Two Truths, we declare there to be, Relative and Absolute. what you and i are discussing is soley in the realm of the Relative for that is where our words are. they can never be anything but in the relative. the Absolute is beyond our ability to properly verbalize and, perhaps, cognize.. it is, as they say, an ineffable experience.We are all part of the community, one large planetary family are we not?
we changeSacredstar said:How will Buddhists respond if at all to the cutting edge science that is proving many of these concepts?
Love beyond measure
Sacredstar
That is democracy though. Government for the people, BY THE PEOPLE etc. If our government is misbehaving, it is our fault. In a dictatorship there is some excuse. If we really all believed and campaigned hard enough we could have a peaceful government. This is often repeated but still needs to be remembered: all that is needed for evil (whatever) to triumph is for good people to do nothing. Another world is possible.Vajradhara said:i fundamentally disagree with SacredStars assesment that if you vote for someone that commits a crime you are equally guilty.
hmm.Virtual_Cliff said:That is democracy though. Government for the people, BY THE PEOPLE etc.
perhaps. i've never been an adherent of group punishment nor of the child inheriting the crimes/sins of the father, though i'm congnizant that lots of Western folks think this is a keen idea.If our government is misbehaving, it is our fault.
I don't know who Ted Kennedy is but if someone commits check fraud (In England) who do you think pays for him to be kept in prison? Or who pays for the victims of car crashes to be cared for in Hospital. The public do in their Taxes. Thats the fundemenatal principal of the welfare system. We all look after each other and tell each other off if we do something bad.Vajradhara said:so... is it your position that if, say Ted Kennedy commits check fraud, that you should pay his debt, serve his time in jail, rather than Ted reaping the consequences of his actions?
perhaps. i've never been an adherent of group punishment nor of the child inheriting the crimes/sins of the father, though i'm congnizant that lots of Western folks think this is a keen idea.
if a person in the government misbehaves, who's responsible for that behavior, you or the person comitting the action?
Does Bush show a good example of loving Al-Quaida? yeah right. What kind of Chrsitianity does he follow? Is it like the kind of Islam that breeds Al Quaida?Love thy enemies. bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you and pray for them which despitefully use you and persecute you