Interesting panel discussion on Guru Ethics

Discussion in 'Alternative' started by Cino, Dec 26, 2018.

  1. Cino

    Cino Big Love

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2018
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    64
    Judaism in Jesus' time was not monolithic. The Gospels mention several factions. It is hardly an "obscure link" between early Christianity and Judaism. And if you read later theologians, the influence of Greek philosophy is also hardly obscure.

    Regardless of my position on Christology, these links are just plain obvious.

    And the do not detract from Jesus' teachings either. He put them forth in Jewish terms, later Generations used Greek philosophy, scienctific terms, even computer science is nowadays a source of words for the expression of religious/spiritual ideas and sentiments.

    Nothing wrong with any of that, to me.
     
  2. RJM Corbet

    RJM Corbet Deus Pascus Corvus

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2016
    Messages:
    1,064
    Likes Received:
    200
    Of course the link to Judaism is not obscure. Christ came as the Jewish messiah. He turned everything on its head. He wasn't just a wandering Jewish misfit.

    The complications just aren't there. There's no need to go searching in Greek and Roman religions for roots of Christianity. Christ simply was who he said he was. It's simple.
     
  3. Thomas

    Thomas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,519
    Likes Received:
    826
    I haven't heard either of those things ...
     
  4. Thomas

    Thomas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    Messages:
    9,519
    Likes Received:
    826
    I operate on the more commonly accepted notion of cherry-picking.

    wiki:
    "Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related cases or data that may contradict that position. It is a kind of fallacy of selective attention, the most common example of which is the confirmation bias.Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally. This fallacy is a major problem in public debate.

    "Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. Confirmation bias is a variation of the more general tendency of apophenia."
     
  5. wil

    wil UNeyeR1

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Messages:
    19,523
    Likes Received:
    921
    And that is the kind of cherry picking that got me to reject what I heard from the pulpit and Sunday school as a kid.

    And reject what I've heard for the past decade from the DOMA supporters and homophobes.

    I realize, thru this forum, that the US is unique in its fundamentalist and evangelistic ways, but if anyone wants to know why church attendance and religious affiliation is down they sure don't have to look far.
     
    Ahanu likes this.

Share This Page