Any anti vax/mask/virus hoaxers here?

wil

UNeyeR1
Veteran Member
Messages
24,586
Reaction score
3,960
Points
108
Location
a figment of your imagination
It is weird...if you are and were among my irl friends and acquaintances I would avoid you like the... err...plague.

But here, I hope we can calmly listen to your reasoning to better understand the train of thought.

Touchy subject (potentially more than our typical religious/science discussions) a test to see if we can remain respectful!
 
Covid in Israel

Israel is showing that the Pfizer vaccine seems to wear off within months, especially with older people.

It doesn’t mean the vaccine doesn’t work at all, but it’s not as effective as originally was thought – especially against the Delta variant.

I’m not anti-vaxx or conspiracy theorist. I have had two Pfizer jabs, less to protect myself than to help bring the country out of lockdown and try get back to normal – but that’s it. I will not be trying any new experimental vaccines, as new covid variants appear.

It is not wrong or callous to ask questions about covid. It's nasty, but the original purpose was to prevent overload upon health services, and in the meantime other very serious medical cases have been unable to get treatment, and the travel industry has effectively been extinguished imo

How will the pandemic end?

"After months of encouraging trendlines, July’s dramatic spike in global COVID-19 infections has dimmed the proverbial light at the end of the pandemic tunnel.

In May, coronavirus cases were declining across the U.S., parts of Europe, and the Middle Eastas vaccination rates rose, spurring an easing of social and travel restrictions and a wave of business reopenings. But in the U.S., at least, any celebration was short-lived. By July, vaccination rates flatlined and highly transmissible coronavirus variants swept the nation, forcing health officials to reimpose masking recommendations and call for increased inoculations.

The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. After 17 grueling and chaotic months, weary people are wondering: When will the pandemic finally end?

“Even among the scientific community, you would get really different answers,” says Rachael Piltch-Loeb, a researcher and fellow with the Emergency Preparedness Research, Evaluation & Practice Program at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “There is no one definition of what the end of a pandemic means.”

A pandemic is by definition a global crisis. Lifting some U.S. public health measures and interventions “gave people a sense that the panic was waning,” Piltch-Loeb says. That euphoria blinded many to the worldwide reality, which remains bleak.

“Until this [virus] is controlled or more limited globally, it’s not going away,” Piltch-Loeb says. That means declaring the pandemic’s “end” may be a distant goal, requiring different conditions depending on who’s asked.

Where do diseases go?

When the worldwide spread of a disease is brought under control in a localized area, it’s no longer a pandemic but an epidemic, according to the WHO. If COVID-19 persists globally at what the WHO judges to be “expected or normal levels,” the organization will then re-designate the disease “endemic.”

… WHO Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus last week reinstated a goal of vaccinating at least 10 percent of every nation’s population by September, with the loftier goal of reaching 40 percent global inoculation by year’s end and 70 percent by mid-2022.

To date, though, just 28 percent of the world’s population has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. And vaccine distribution remains wildly lopsided. The European Union has nearly three-fourths of its eligible population at least partially inoculated; the U.S. has vaccinated 68 percent of people 12 and older.

But other nations that have lost many people to COVID-19—including Indonesia, India, and many of the countries in Africa—are working at a much slower pace. That’s in part because Covax, the United-Nations-backed program to vaccinate the world, has struggled to acquire and deliver vaccines for the world’s poorest countries. This week, the WHO issued a plea for wealthy countries to donate vaccine doses to poorer nations before offering booster shots to their own populations …
 
Last edited by a moderator:
“Until this [virus] is controlled or more limited globally, it’s not going away,” Piltch-Loeb says. That means declaring the pandemic’s “end” may be a distant goal, requiring different conditions depending on who’s asked.
It is a virus. The common cold is a virus. Influenza is a virus. We have not eradicated those two, it is unreasonable to think we can eradicate Covid-19. The best we can hope, like the cold and flu, is to limit the spread and moderate the symptoms, particularly among the vulnerable populations (elderly, immunocompromised) as it has always been.

Face masks are a joke if not worn correctly. Using fabric is like stopping golf balls with a chain link fence. Medical grade facemasks are appropriate, or for the hyper-determined out of an abundance of caution a plastic bag over the head tightly secured around the neck is the safest bet. </sarcasm - don't try this at home>

A person's eyes are another entrance point. And if one pays close attention to the videos of the Chinese disinfection crews, they are power washing floors with disinfectant...shoes are another source of transmission as the infected droplets fall to the floor and get picked up on the soles of shoes.

There are therapeutics with a 40 year plus track record and evidence based treatment success that are deliberately being politically downplayed. How much stock in Pfizer does Fauci and other politicians own, I wonder?

Simple hygiene, washing hands, not picking your nose or rubbing your face, all of the stuff doctors have preached since you were in grade school, goes a long way towards prevention.

None of this is conspiracy "hoax," it is looking at the matter with eyes wide open having not drunk the koolaid. Fauci tells people what he wants them to hear, he can't make up his own "scientific" mind...sounds more like a b.s. artist than a scientist.
 
Last edited:
not picking your nose
Whoa! Heavy ask ... lol
How much stock in Pfizer does Fauci and other politicians own, I wonder?
... Fauci tells people what he wants them to hear ...
This starts getting into conspiracy territory, which I disown. I believe governments have been doing the best they can. They can't just let people die, or be seen to do so, if deaths can be avoided.

But it has to reach the point where health services have to live with covid, and begin to address the huge backlog of other very serious medical conditions that have been put on the back-burner, imo
 
Last edited:
And hoaxes, huh? Not just a little misleading, is it?

Have you quit beating your wife?
I meant hoaxers, autocorrect got me. As in people who believe it to be a hoax, like beating your wife you either do or you don't, I ain't accusing anyone...just asking. Been decades since I heard anyone proud of beating their wife....i know a lot that are vocally proud to state it is all a hoax...and they come in a variety of flavors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJM
How is baiting "hoaxers" *any* different??? No different, at all, than asking if someone has quit beating their wife...any alternate response is by default sucker to a hoax. And what if you learn you've been duped through the whole thing?

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but there is too much that does not add up. People *fully* vaccinated are getting sick, hospitalized, and dying. The numbers are higher than reported, they are deliberately downplaying the breakthrough cases. That's not conspiracy, that's fact. Also fact, there are doctors having great success (close to 100%) if caught early enough using established therapeutics...why the push for experimental, still unapproved, vaccines? Why is social media covering up these facts? Nothing whatsoever to do with conspiracy theory, and the only hoax is being perpetrated by the government.

So the very title of this thread is bait for a trap, enter if you dare so we can deficate all over you who spit out the koolaid. I am offended.

My body, my choice. Get over it.
 
Last edited:
How is baiting "hoaxers" *any* different???
How am I baiting anyone here?

I am interested in folks thoughts....what I have heard so far sounds ridiculous. I have not found any viable reason to avoid it. Risk vs reward seems straightforward to me and I wish to understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJM
A thoughtful article

MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,' and 'Sophisticated'

..
. Trying to shame the holdouts has failed spectacularly. Insulting and degrading them as “morons” or “ignorant” has resulted in a vicious pushback and a hardening of positions on getting vaccinated.

The administration’s plan of sending people door to door to vaccinate them only feeds anti-vaccine skepticism. Trust in authority is at an all-time low, which makes a government-sponsored vaccine program suspect.

Proponents of the vaccine are unwilling or unable to understand the thinking of vaccine skeptics — or even admit that skeptics may be thinking at all. Their attempts to answer skepticism or understand it end up poisoned by condescension, and end up reinforcing it.

But a study done at MIT showed that a substantial portion of public-health skepticism was highly informed, scientifically literate, and sophisticated in the use of data. Skeptics used the same data sets as those with the orthodox views on public health.

A more holistic approach to vaccine skepticism is needed if we are to get everyone who needs to be vaccinated protected. Allowances must be made for the legitimate concerns of citizens who, for their own reasons, don’t want to get jabbed. But if indeed, individuals are doing their own risk-benefit calculations, it would help enormously if the Left would refrain from their sickening condescension toward those with serious, legitimate questions ...
 
A thoughtful article

MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed, Scientifically Literate,' and 'Sophisticated'

..
. Trying to shame the holdouts has failed spectacularly. Insulting and degrading them as “morons” or “ignorant” has resulted in a vicious pushback and a hardening of positions on getting vaccinated.

The administration’s plan of sending people door to door to vaccinate them only feeds anti-vaccine skepticism. Trust in authority is at an all-time low, which makes a government-sponsored vaccine program suspect.

Proponents of the vaccine are unwilling or unable to understand the thinking of vaccine skeptics — or even admit that skeptics may be thinking at all. Their attempts to answer skepticism or understand it end up poisoned by condescension, and end up reinforcing it.

But a study done at MIT showed that a substantial portion of public-health skepticism was highly informed, scientifically literate, and sophisticated in the use of data. Skeptics used the same data sets as those with the orthodox views on public health.

A more holistic approach to vaccine skepticism is needed if we are to get everyone who needs to be vaccinated protected. Allowances must be made for the legitimate concerns of citizens who, for their own reasons, don’t want to get jabbed. But if indeed, individuals are doing their own risk-benefit calculations, it would help enormously if the Left would refrain from their sickening condescension toward those with serious, legitimate questions ...
Thank you. This says it far more politely than I would have.
 
I work in a hospital, I am vaccinated (single dose J&J, which with the initial concerns behind me, so far appears to be the more effective, though I had no way to know at the time). I *chose* to get vaccinated because of my work environment. As time goes on it is looking more to me like a BIG medical experiment. I respect those exercising their G!d given and Constitutionally guaranteed right to control over their own body.

How about all the genetic data collection going on? Think that conspiracy? What about sites where folks voluntarily give up their DNA, ostensibly to chase out their family tree? One might ask, what does that have to do with Covid and vaccinations?, and that would be a reasonable question. How about tailored "biological warfare?" Think that farfetched, clearly one hasn't followed the science touted ever since the Genomic Code was deciphered. Immediately after it was touted that "now treatments for diseases like cancer can be tailored to the individual's unique genomic signature." And if treatments to cure can be tailored, so can bio-weapons. No longer is that science fiction, and hasn't been for some years now.

Fauci once argued viral experiments worth the risk of pandemic (nypost.com)

Dr. Anthony Fauci once argued that conducting experiments on contagious viruses to increase their potency was worth the risk, even if the work could accidentally lead to a pandemic, it was revealed Friday.

The nation’s chief medical advisor wrote in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012 of the public health benefit to gain-of-function viral experiments — which center on manipulating viruses and making them stronger — as long as there is significant oversight.

In the article, first reported by The Australian, Fauci also noted that a pause on such studies should continue until researchers can figure out how to do them more transparently.

Gain-of-function experiments are the sort of work that was being conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology when the COVID-19 pandemic first started in China in late 2019 and some experts fear a lab accident is what led to the global outbreak that killed 3.4 million.

In the 2012 paper, Fauci acknowledged the risky research could lead to serious lab accidents but the chance is rare and the work is “important” because it helps the scientific community prepare for naturally occurring pandemics.

He wrote that it was “more likely” that a pandemic would occur naturally and “the need to stay ahead of such a threat is a primary reason for performing an experiment that might appear to be risky.”

However, he noted the scientific community “must respect that there are genuine and legitimate concerns about this type of research, both domestically and globally.”

“We cannot expect those who have these concerns to simply take us, the scientific community, at our word that the benefits of this work outweigh the risks, nor can we ignore their calls for greater transparency, their concerns about conflicts of interest, and their efforts to engage in a dialog about whether these experiments should have been performed in the first place,” Fauci wrote.

How is this conspiracy? Ignoring the facts does not make them go away.
 
Last edited:
Fauci once argued viral experiments worth the risk of pandemic (nypost.com)

How is this a conspiracy ? Ignoring the facts does not make them go away.
But I don't see this as suspicious. It's what it says: the possibility of a naturally occurring pandemic justified gain of function research and benefit of such research outweighed the risks.

It was a mistake in hindsight -- assuming the virus escaped from the Wuhan lab -- but it was never a covert cabal with Fauci setting himself up to benefit from covid, by investment in Phizer, etc. Imo

It says Fauci was calling for more transparency about the research, not trying to cover it up?
ever since the Genomic Code was deciphered. Immediately after it was touted that "now treatments for diseases like cancer can be tailored to the individual's unique genomic signature." And if treatments to cure can be tailored, so can bio-weapons. No longer is that science fiction, and hasn't been for some years now.
That's the nature of scientific research: it can as often be used for ill purpose, as for good?
 
Last edited:
Carman refuses to get vaccinated ...

 
... it was never a covert cabal with Fauci setting himself up to benefit from covid, by investment in Phizer, etc. Imo
Follow the money:

https://dissidentvoice.org/2020/08/lancetgate-why-was-this-monumental-fraud-not-a-huge-scandal/

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...onavirus-papers-over-data-integrity-questions

LancetGate - Knowledge is Good

Funny what one can find once one knows what questions to ask...why wasn't this retraction from the Lancet a bigger story? That was a monumental moment in science, that doesn't just happen. And so much of the first world response to this virus was directly in response to that *fake* study, proven fake, acknowledged fake...and quietly buried while bigwigs proceed as if it is still valid, and the average joe doesn't even know to ask the question...

Conspiracy alright, but not by me. Follow the money, the motivation is money.
 
Back
Top