Philosophical acrobatics.
Well that only shows that 'my' philosophy is vibrant and dynamic whilst yours is, sadly, moribund.
The philosophical thesis of a naturalistic materialism, that you seem to think defeats all other theses, has itself been defeated.
Erwin Schrödinger: "Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else." ('General Scientific and Popular Papers' in
Collected Papers, Vol. 4. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg & Sohn. p. 334.)
Werner Heisenberg: Held that quantum physics had undermined materialism; that quantum entities as 'probabilities' rather than 'particles' supports a mathematical, Platonic realist, rather than materialist, conception of reality: "modern physics takes a definite stand against the materialism of Democritus, and for Plato and the Pythagoreans". (Heisenberg, Werner (1958).
Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. Harper & Row. pp. 34–35.)
Step on ... Quantum Mechanics:
"Then came our Quantum theory, which totally transformed our image of matter... An extension of the quantum theory goes beyond even this... Quantum physics undermines materialism because it reveals that matter has far less "substance" than we might believe. But another development goes even further by demolishing Newton's image of matter as inert lumps. This development is the theory of chaos, which has recently gained widespread attention. (Paul Davies and John Gribbin,
The Matter Myth, Chapter 1: 'The Death of Materialism')
And on ... Digital Physics:
Digital Physics views 'information' rather than matter as fundamental: "all matter and all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and this is a participatory universe." (Wojciech H. Zurek, ed. 1990. 'Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links' in
Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information.)
Max Planck:
"As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter." ( Max Planck,
Das Wesen der Materie, a speech delivered in Florence in 1944).
I could list more.
None of the above, of course, are arguments for God per se, but they are arguments for consciousness being as fundamental to nature as matter, if not the superior partner of the two, which rather relegates your arguments to the bin of out-moded sciences.
Again,
I do not argue against atheism – everyone has a right to believe as they wish – but
I do dismiss your arguments against theism for reasons outlined above. I follow contemporary science that says an assumption of infallibility of position is untenable.
+++
Again, take the blinkers off, old chum.
My mention of
panpsychism, which is gaining increasing traction in scientific circles, is sufficient to consign your theories to the bin.
Have not come across any such evidence. Yes, God/Gods/Goddesses can exist if FSM can exist.
And here you commit the common logical fallacy of
false analogy ...