T
Tao_Equus
Guest
As some of you are aware since finding this wonderful forum I have been rather engaged in the threads regarding evolution. I think some have tended to see me as a Darwinist, whatever that is, that believes rigidly in certain evolutionary principles. This is not the case. I have stated more than once now that my own personal hunch is that one of the 'missing' dynamics of evolutionary theory has it answers in the concept of Gaia theory.
The principles of Gaia theory are not new and can be found in many so called primitive culture's religeous beliefs. But in modern times it was James Lovelocks theory devised in the 1960's and first published as a scientific paper in 1973 that has conceptualised it anew for us. The basic premise is that all life on earth, the entire biosphere, acts as though it were a single organism. Adherants of the theory come in at four levels.
Level 1; Acceptance that life on earth has radicaly changed the surface of the planet. This is scientificly undeniable and widely accepted.
Level 2; Life on earth as a whole acts to regulate the optimum conditions for its survival within the biosphere, that life on earth is actually a self-organising system.
Level 3; Life on earth is a single 'being' and that every living species is but a constituent part of a much greater whole.
Level 4; As above but this 'being' is concious and intelligent and one of countless throughout the cosmos.
If level 4 is in fact the truth does it not explain where we get this powerful sense of God from? Does it not give good explanation as to why so many of us feel like we are 'a part' of God? These ideas seemed intuitively obvious to more ancient cultures that had to survive in the 'real' world, in nature, and not the modern world where man seeks to control every aspect of his enviroment. Most of us have never seen first hand the complex inter-relationships that play out in nature and reach so many improbable harmonious equilibriums. Except in quickly forgotten nature documentaries none of us gives a second thought to the myriad little inter-relationships being played out right now across our planet. Even in the human body itself the complex array of friendly bacteria that keep us alive is staggering.
It seems to me that most of our modern religeons, and by that I mean all religeons with a written history, are an entirely anthropocentic hijacking of this sense of belonging to life on earth that we all feel. Most are at best a moral code for human relationships to aid our co-existance or a source of comfort in time of distress. At worst, and all too commonly, they are a weapon of power hungry individuals who use it to supress free will and exploration of the individual and turn it to thier profit. So many Evangelists, Mullahs, Guru's and their like have been exposed as fraudsters and charlatans that it seems incredible to me that mankind as a whole is not far more sceptical. But I understand too how powerful this sense of knowing and belonging is and how powrful the need to find some way to express it.
I think I come in at level 3 personaly. I am not convinced that Gaia is intelligent in the human sense. But Gaia is the supreme organism if not the supreme being and I believe we are a part of it that has been evolved for a specific purpose. We are Gaia's reproductive organ. Humankind alone has the capacity and will to carry life beyond this sphere and the sooner we start working together as a whole the sooner this will happen.
I hope that this thread will be a place to explore the many examples of how Gaia acts on earth to achieve its aims. And to discuss issues pertaining to the exact level of conciousness Gaia is exhibiting. I deliberately chose this section over the science and technology thread because I see it best discussed here in the context of belief and spirituality. The science of Gaia is less interesting to me in this instance than its profound spiritual ones.
Regards to all TE
The principles of Gaia theory are not new and can be found in many so called primitive culture's religeous beliefs. But in modern times it was James Lovelocks theory devised in the 1960's and first published as a scientific paper in 1973 that has conceptualised it anew for us. The basic premise is that all life on earth, the entire biosphere, acts as though it were a single organism. Adherants of the theory come in at four levels.
Level 1; Acceptance that life on earth has radicaly changed the surface of the planet. This is scientificly undeniable and widely accepted.
Level 2; Life on earth as a whole acts to regulate the optimum conditions for its survival within the biosphere, that life on earth is actually a self-organising system.
Level 3; Life on earth is a single 'being' and that every living species is but a constituent part of a much greater whole.
Level 4; As above but this 'being' is concious and intelligent and one of countless throughout the cosmos.
If level 4 is in fact the truth does it not explain where we get this powerful sense of God from? Does it not give good explanation as to why so many of us feel like we are 'a part' of God? These ideas seemed intuitively obvious to more ancient cultures that had to survive in the 'real' world, in nature, and not the modern world where man seeks to control every aspect of his enviroment. Most of us have never seen first hand the complex inter-relationships that play out in nature and reach so many improbable harmonious equilibriums. Except in quickly forgotten nature documentaries none of us gives a second thought to the myriad little inter-relationships being played out right now across our planet. Even in the human body itself the complex array of friendly bacteria that keep us alive is staggering.
It seems to me that most of our modern religeons, and by that I mean all religeons with a written history, are an entirely anthropocentic hijacking of this sense of belonging to life on earth that we all feel. Most are at best a moral code for human relationships to aid our co-existance or a source of comfort in time of distress. At worst, and all too commonly, they are a weapon of power hungry individuals who use it to supress free will and exploration of the individual and turn it to thier profit. So many Evangelists, Mullahs, Guru's and their like have been exposed as fraudsters and charlatans that it seems incredible to me that mankind as a whole is not far more sceptical. But I understand too how powerful this sense of knowing and belonging is and how powrful the need to find some way to express it.
I think I come in at level 3 personaly. I am not convinced that Gaia is intelligent in the human sense. But Gaia is the supreme organism if not the supreme being and I believe we are a part of it that has been evolved for a specific purpose. We are Gaia's reproductive organ. Humankind alone has the capacity and will to carry life beyond this sphere and the sooner we start working together as a whole the sooner this will happen.
I hope that this thread will be a place to explore the many examples of how Gaia acts on earth to achieve its aims. And to discuss issues pertaining to the exact level of conciousness Gaia is exhibiting. I deliberately chose this section over the science and technology thread because I see it best discussed here in the context of belief and spirituality. The science of Gaia is less interesting to me in this instance than its profound spiritual ones.
Regards to all TE