Virtual_Cliff
Well-Known Member
I hear in the news that there is to be a vote in the UK parliament on whether to end our blasphemy law.
While I don't like the idea of censorship, and think it should be kept to a bare minimum, I am unhappy that this issue will be debated within the context of a rationalist, post-enlightenment culture.
From this point of view, religion is simply a matter of opinion, something you can discuss like the issue of inheritance tax. With every respect to all CR forum members, I would say that rationalist language does not contain the vocabulary to describe religious faith in the way it is held by some communities.
For some people, their faith literally gets them out of bed each morning, it gives them an identity and a place in society and in the world, it is their community and their reason for living. To attack this is to destroy their way of life. One thinks of Australian aboriginees (is this PC?) resorting to drink and crime after their land was taken away. To allow an attack on faith is to allow an attack on the fabric of the lives of entire communities.
If the blasphemy laws have to go, they should be replaced with something that ensures respect for believers and belief of all kinds.
While I don't like the idea of censorship, and think it should be kept to a bare minimum, I am unhappy that this issue will be debated within the context of a rationalist, post-enlightenment culture.
From this point of view, religion is simply a matter of opinion, something you can discuss like the issue of inheritance tax. With every respect to all CR forum members, I would say that rationalist language does not contain the vocabulary to describe religious faith in the way it is held by some communities.
For some people, their faith literally gets them out of bed each morning, it gives them an identity and a place in society and in the world, it is their community and their reason for living. To attack this is to destroy their way of life. One thinks of Australian aboriginees (is this PC?) resorting to drink and crime after their land was taken away. To allow an attack on faith is to allow an attack on the fabric of the lives of entire communities.
If the blasphemy laws have to go, they should be replaced with something that ensures respect for believers and belief of all kinds.