How bizarre.
According to this then I am an atheist because I don't see G-d as a person?
Will wonders never cease?
No. You would have fallen into the category of non-atheist (so long as you do not self-identify as atheist).
Atheists and agnostics were self-identified (that is, they reported themselves as belonging to that category).
In a separate question, people were asked (1) if they believed in God, (2) how sure they were that God existed, and (3) if they thought God was a person or an impersonal force.
60% of respondants said they saw God as a person; 25% said they saw God as an impersonal force.
Most Christians saw God as a person, though a significant minority of mainline Protestants, Orthodox, and Catholics saw God as a force. (Interesting- yes? The oldest Christian denominations were more likely to see God as a force than a person.)
In contrast, it was more common for Jews, Hindus, and Buddhists (as well as unaffiliated folks) to see God as a force than a person. Muslims were split about evenly between seeing God as a person and God as a force.
I think that's par for course- Christianity has the question of what to do about Jesus. Jesus makes God more personable. When God is One and incomprehensibly huge, it makes more sense to see God as an impersonal force.
I wondered if it would be possible to answer "both" with some caveats. I have a foot in both camps- seeing God as an incomprehensibly big force and yet One that manifests in personal ways when I need it. That is, God is responsive but has no distinct human-like personality.