Dondi
Well-Known Member
If that is the case, how did Johnny law get involved? Someone had to complain about traffic, some other issue to bring them in.
A one time party may violate some sort of zoning but most neighbors put up with it.
Face it, if it was an every tuesday night orgy or wife swapping or amway meeting or band practice and disturbed the neighbors on a regular basis someone would complain and the law would step in.
This has nothing to do with a bible study, they are just making it so.
SanDiego6 article said:The most frustrating aspect of this entire issue for Jones is that he feels the county officials are not telling the truth about the parking issue.
Jones said in all of the written and oral complaints over five weeks, nowhere has parking been mentioned. "None of it is on parking, all of it talks about a religious assembly...We've had hours of conversations, that's what it has been every time."
This is the issue right here. They approached the pastor on the religious assembly issue, not on a parking issue, which I think is disingenious. If parking was the problem, they ought to have said so.
And BTW, it may even come up that a bible study does not constitute a 'religious assembly', since the ordinance code states the definition:
1370 RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY.
The Religious Assembly use type refers to religious services involving public assembly such as customarily occurs in synagogues, temples, and churches. [Emphasis mine]
The Religious Assembly use type refers to religious services involving public assembly such as customarily occurs in synagogues, temples, and churches. [Emphasis mine]
A bible study is not a religious service, per se. It is an informal gathering in private setting and by invitation only, not a public forum. Now it might be because the person conducting the bible study in this case is a pastor. I wonder if he would have gotten the same treatment if it was a layperson. In any event, it wasn't like it was a primary place of worship where anyone could waltz in.