there is a wealth of safety data concerning most homeopathic and herbal medicines. Germany, Belgium, the United Kingdom, America, Japan. Everybody's at it. Not silly old women in dark storerooms with cauldrons- we're talking good hard science.
We're not talking anecdotal evidence; "Aunty Mary says this is good for piles", we're talking rigorous clinical trials. I have a great list of decent herbal sites in my cupboard- I will dig it out over the next couple of days and I will give you a link.
Now, the summum bonnum of clinical trials is... type 1- human, double blind, random, one group of random patients gets a placebo, the other the real stuff, etc... now, there isn't a lot of that- instead, most of it is type 2- tested by humans, yet the people know what they are getting, etc...
and there are also a lot of.. 3, animal (rat) tests, and 4, individual cases, anecdotal from professionals data...
There is lots and lots of information about what works, and who it works for, and who shouldn't take it. If you haven't got the intellectual capacity to do the research then you shouldn't take the herb. If you blindly imbibe some random chemical and you get sick- tough on you. You should have taken responsibility and not be so naive.
Herbal medicine is just as dangerous, potentially, as conventional medicine. Take for instance, St John's Wort. Everyone has heard of it. Well, SJW is AS EFFECTIVE as antidepressants in treating mild to moderate depression. Its a fact. However... it can cause photophobia and liver disease. People with hepatitis, etc, should not use it.
Echinacea, everyone thinks... ooh, I hear that helps colds go quicker and is good for chronic infections, yet... it works by stimulating the production of leucocytes... unfortunately if you have HIV using this herb can increase your viral load and potentially kill you.
One major problem is... the way herbal medicines are regulated. They cannot state on the bottle what this herb is used for, and nor can they give you a list of potential side effects. Most of the time you, the individual, relies on the anecdotal evidence.
This does not happen in conventional medicine. You get patients safety information inside the packet as a matter of course. The same should apply to herbal medicines. Unfortunately, most university research into drugs is funded by the drugs companies, and they do not want you to have an option, herb or drug. They just want you to use the drug. Their drug.
Who should develop new medicines? Nobody. There are millions of drugs and herbs already in existence. That might sound foolish, but...
Look at it another way. Medicine comes into two types- preventative, and symptom-management.
There may be millions of different ailments, but there are really only a few symptoms.
1Pain- we can alleiviate.
2Inflammation- we can reduce.
3too low/too high BP- we can fix.
4Bleeding- we can stem it.
5Broken bits- we fix by sewing and splinting.
6cancer- we cut it out and blast you with drugs/radiation.
7fever- we can reduce.
8infections- we already have drugs to kill most viral/bacterial infections
9parasites/toxins- kill and flush..
10abnormal levels of- various blood components/hormones/neurotransmitters- restabilisation
11psychological issues...
that's it... all the rest is window dressing...
what else is there? Any symptom you have, we can treat. Nobody said anything about cures... for most illnesses and conditions, there are no cures.
The primary causes of early death in the "western world" are...
heart disease, cancer, and obesity...
most early deaths in the western world are not related to anything except... poor lifestyle choices, greed, and poverty... we can't make a medicine to fix those things, they are social problems, untimately, which impact on health. We can't patent a drug to treat stupidity or greed or poverty.
Look at Alli... orlestat (sp?), This anti-obesity drug has been available for years on prescription in the UK. You had to have a BMI over a certain number before they would prescribe. Now it has been liscenced as an OTC preperation, not as strong as the prescription, but still...
a drug that melts away fat...
a drug that makes you poo in your pants, fatty, greasy turds, like the oil slick left behind in a cheap Balti pan... in your pants... on the train... at work... suddenly... the poop will appear, like a small brown urgent river...
it works, yes... but only because when you're on it you give up eating- you're too scared to eat- in case you poo your pants...
not... hey, here's what you need to do... you need to burn more calories daily than you consume... oh no. Instead... sure, eat the pizza and burgers, fatty, by all means, now you can take a pill and well, you might have difficulty removing the skid marks from your pants, and well, you can forget about buying that white leather sofa, but you won't be fat... ! hurrah!
I think that viewing "medicine" and "cures" and "symptom management" as our goals means we've missed a trick. We should be putting our cash, not into making new drugs, as we have plenty, but in genetics.
Looking for cures, not quick-fixes, is the answer. Genetically modified human beings is the way forward. Then , well, technically at least, we could get rid of the need for the majority of drugs.
Instead of sending rockets into space, we should all collectively, globally, put our top scientists on the case. The governments pay for space exploration. Everyone is at it. What a waste of money. Instead, put it into genetics. Let's all be supermen.