The Laws of Moses......... perfect for their time.

Cino

Big Love! (Atheist mystic)
Admin
Messages
3,487
Reaction score
1,899
Points
108
Location
Germany
Keep the laws and prosper, or ignore them and fail.........dreadfully.
They were told.......
The Commandments are part of the Covenant. At the time, covenants were common forms of treaty between powerful kings and their vassals. Hittite overlord, Mesopotaminan vassal principality, Egyptian Pharaoh, Levantine vassal state... some of these covenant treaty texts were recovered by archaeologists, and this kind of clause at the end was a common feature.
 

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
Obligatory Anatole France quote: "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread." ;)
French law?
So much for the French Revolution .....;)
 

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
The Commandments are part of the Covenant. At the time, covenants were common forms of treaty between powerful kings and their vassals. Hittite overlord, Mesopotaminan vassal principality, Egyptian Pharaoh, Levantine vassal state... some of these covenant treaty texts were recovered by archaeologists, and this kind of clause at the end was a common feature.
I think that the laws of Moses were much more social, though. Did you notice my post which showed the many poor laws? And as I trawl through the laws it seems as if Land could not be bought and sold as freehold, only as leasehold. While I look through I'm hoping to find/see the law that forbid Levites (Priesthood) from owning land, they could only posses their homes. But so far I can't find it.
 

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
Obligatory Anatole France quote: "The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread." ;)
Ha ha! Cino, I've just realised that Anatole's quote is relevant to the UK at this time, where relatives have been unable to see their loved ones before death due to Covid rules....while our leaders were partying together.

I also think that this was the Baptist's and Jesus's main concern, two millennia back. The Levite ruling clan were fat, greedy, corrupt and hypocritical. BUt that's just how I see it all.
 

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
Deuteronomy {4:1} Now therefore hearken, O Israel, unto the statutes and unto the judgments, which I teach you, for to do [them,] that ye may live, and go in and possess the land which the LORD God of your fathers giveth you. {4:2} Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

No redactions, no amendments.
 

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
Deuteronomy {4:8} And what nation [is there so] great, that hath statutes and judgments [so] righteous as all this law, which I set before you this day?

Sometimes folks tell that these laws were not so new, that their like had existed before, elsewhere. Maybe one, or two, or a few..... but not such a collection as this, I'm thinking.
That this legislation had been written by mankind all that time ago is remarkable.
 

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
Deuteronomy {8:17} And thou say in thine heart, My power and the might of [mine] hand hath gotten me this wealth. {8:18} But thou shalt remember the LORD thy God: for [it is] he that giveth thee power to get wealth, ..................................

What a good lesson for any era, for any people........
I believe that it is Nature, Fate and Luck which give us our strengths, our intellects and our abilities.
Nature, Fate and Luck also give us our weaknesses and inabilities.

Yet many strong and clever people strut their successes with claims such as 'I did all this!' No, they did not........ Nature, Fate and Luck were on their side, I think.
What do you think?
 

RJM

God Feeds the Ravens
Admin
Messages
8,998
Reaction score
2,111
Points
108
What do you think?
I think you change what scripture actually says to something it does not say, and then deduce a meaning of your own.

The first commandment does not say thou shall have no other gods before Nature, Fate and Luck, imo ...
 
Last edited:

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
I think you change what scripture actually says to something it does not say, and then deduce a meaning of your own.

The first commandment does not say thou shall have no other gods before Nature, Fate and Luck, imo ...
I change nothing.
I simply have beliefs, thus:-
I believe that it is Nature, Fate and Luck which give us our strengths, our intellects and our abilities.
Nature, Fate and Luck also give us our weaknesses and inabilities.

If you think that it is God who hands out disability to folks then, fair enough.
 

Thomas

Administrator
Admin
Messages
12,379
Reaction score
2,625
Points
108
... At the time, covenants were common forms of treaty between powerful kings and their vassals.
The first three commandments might be said to be particular to the Jews, although whatever or whoever your god was, you were his/hers, so even here there is a certain commonality, and the gods were usually jealous, possessive and quick to anger.

Interestingly, in the 'theatrical' setting as detailed in Exodus 20: the mountain, fire, smoke, trumpets ... echo some of the details given in other covenant accounts. There would be sacred fires, the sounding of horns and trumpets, drums and gongs, usually there was a procession from the low to high, and so on.

Further on, it is said that the only acceptable sacrifice is on the altar in the temple, all of which is detailed, but then very soon the Kings and patriarchs of Israel were raising altars wherever, and offering sacrifice. Of course, these altars would be sanctioned by God, and reference the temple.
 

Thomas

Administrator
Admin
Messages
12,379
Reaction score
2,625
Points
108
I believe that it is Nature, Fate and Luck which give us our strengths, our intellects and our abilities.
Nature, Fate and Luck also give us our weaknesses and inabilities.
If you think that it is God who hands out disability to folks then, fair enough.
I think that's a too literal reading of the idea, although I will accept that people tend to read it literally, as indeed, one could argue you place too much emphasis on Nature, Fate and Luck.

Ontologically, of course, everything come from the First Cause, but locally I'd factor in a bit of genetics, a bit of nurture, a huge dollop of random contingency, which I suppose one might attribute to 'fate' and 'luck'.
 

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
I think that's a too literal reading of the idea, although I will accept that people tend to read it literally, as indeed, one could argue you place too much emphasis on Nature, Fate and Luck.

Ontologically, of course, everything come from the First Cause, but locally I'd factor in a bit of genetics, a bit of nurture, a huge dollop of random contingency, which I suppose one might attribute to 'fate' and 'luck'.

Oh....that's all a natural reading of the idea.
There isn't a condition that isn't linked to ability or disability, and all are part of Nature, part of the chaos or chance.

And that fits so well with Deuteronomy 8:18

A Theist might offer: 'There but for the grace of God, go I.'
A Deist would offer: 'There but for Nature's chance.' At least, I would.
 

RJM

God Feeds the Ravens
Admin
Messages
8,998
Reaction score
2,111
Points
108
I change nothing.
I simply have beliefs, thus:-
I believe that it is Nature, Fate and Luck which give us our strengths, our intellects and our abilities.
Nature, Fate and Luck also give us our weaknesses and inabilities.

If you think that it is God who hands out disability to folks then, fair enough.
To me that is equating your own Deist belief with the scripture of a people who clearly do not share it? The laws of Moses reference God/the Lord and to drop that part is to disregard the central issue and purpose?
 

Thomas

Administrator
Admin
Messages
12,379
Reaction score
2,625
Points
108
A Theist might offer: 'There but for the grace of God, go I.'
A Deist would offer: 'There but for Nature's chance.' At least, I would.
True.

This Theist acknowledges both: The Divine Nature and the Contingency of Creation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RJM

Cino

Big Love! (Atheist mystic)
Admin
Messages
3,487
Reaction score
1,899
Points
108
Location
Germany
The first three commandments might be said to be particular to the Jews, although whatever or whoever your god was, you were his/hers, so even here there is a certain commonality, and the gods were usually jealous, possessive and quick to anger.
I remember having read or been told that the first few commandments have parallels with some Hittite treaty texts - only there, it is the Hittite King who is to be loved with all the vassal's heart etc.

Further on, it is said that the only acceptable sacrifice is on the altar in the temple, all of which is detailed, but then very soon the Kings and patriarchs of Israel were raising altars wherever, and offering sacrifice. Of course, these altars would be sanctioned by God, and reference the temple.

There are interesting differences between the Commandments as detailed in Deuteronomy, and those in Exodus - for example, regarding the festival of Passover, and, as you hint at, acceptable location(s) for sacrificing. I'm way out of my depth here, but again, I remember having read that the Exodus version reflected the nomadic lifestyle pre conquest of Canaan, while the Deuteronomy version has even been interpreted as the scroll of the Law discovered during King Josiah's temple repairs?
 
Last edited:

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
To me that is equating your own Deist belief with the scripture of a people who clearly do not share it? The laws of Moses reference God/the Lord and to drop that part is to disregard the central issue and purpose?

I don't believe that Jesus supported more than his God and his God's laws, especially the poor laws. The laws of Moses were written for the children of Israel.

You mention 'dropping parts'.......... I get the impression that Christianity dropped hundreds of those parts.
 

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
True.

This Theist acknowledges both: The Divine Nature and the Contingency of Creation.
Nature is the absolute ruler here, so I guess in that sense Nature could be regarded as divine.
But I don't accept creation, only our existence through the chance of chaos.
 

RJM

God Feeds the Ravens
Admin
Messages
8,998
Reaction score
2,111
Points
108
The laws of Moses were written for the children of Israel.
With God/the Lord front and centre?
get the impression that Christianity dropped hundreds of those parts.
Can you detail them? Altho this thread is not about Christianity?
But I don't accept creation, only our existence through the chance of chaos.
However the authors and followers of the laws of Moses did, and still do ... so ... removing God/the Lord out of it ... to infer from them other than their stated intention?

edited ...
 
Last edited:

badger

Well-Known Member
Messages
965
Reaction score
369
Points
63
With God/the Lord front and centre?
Can you detail them? Altho this thread is not about Christianity?
However the authors and followers of the laws of Moses did, and still do ... so ... removing God/the Lord out of it ... to infer from them other than their stated intention?

edited ...
Ah, but I think that mankind wrote those laws, and in your case I am writing to a Christian, and as a Deist I have to believe that Nature rules here.
You asked if I can detail all the laws left out by Christianity, all I can say is that many were redacted, unless you would like to correct that.
 
Top