Again, the issue for me isn't that you're Baha'i and believe your religion is the correct one, but that you don't show interest in other people's religions, and only seem to be interested in sharing Baha'u'llah's message.
Well, you know .. us converts are a bit zealous..@Tony Bristow-Stagg why do you never respond to statements like this? I'm not the only one who has brought this up.
Well, you know .. us converts are a bit zealous..![]()
I see it is the urgency of the age I live in. I not here for myself. I personally understand the motivation behind people's Faiths. I see them in a light of Oneness.@Tony Bristow-Stagg why do you never respond to statements like this? I'm not the only one who has brought this up.
The motivation is to impart to as many people possible, that this unity will only be founded as foretold.
I admit It is actually very frustrating quandary. On the one hand there are teachings that require us to do as you suggest, on the other, it is now approaching 180 years since the dawn of a new day.Okay, I guess that's my answer! I do think you're missing out by being here only to evangelize, and not to learn about others' beliefs though.
You're still not getting it, Tony.I admit It is actually very frustrating quandary. On the one hand there are teachings that require us to do as you suggest, on the other, it is now approaching 180 years since the dawn of a new day.
My black and white reasoning with my impatience demeanour has always seen me approach life like a bull at the gate. So, If someone is just about to get hit by a bus, do you ask them what time of day it is, ask them how they are going, or do you urgentlty warn them about the bus? It is now for 180 years this Message has been neglected, that neglected will be humanities downfall. ( I am confident that if this Message is not from God, then there has never been any Message from God)
Is it only my quandary, or is it a quandary for all of us?
Regards Tony
They are all from the same source RJM, they are all the Truth.You're still not getting it, Tony.
Black and white or not. How can you go shouting from the rooftops that your Baha'i belief is the only true one for all humanity when you admittedly know next to nothing about any others beyond what your Baha'i sources tell you, and admit that you are not interested in learning anything about them, lol?
Just who is the one wearing blinkers around here?
It's not a quandary -- it's just a farce really, imo
You know this how? You know next to nothing about them, by your own admissionThey are all from the same source RJM, they are all the Truth.
You are not permitted to interpret your own Baha'i writings but the Bible and other scriptures are fair game to be manipulated to try to justify Baha'u'llah's claims?Out interpretation is a different story, that unfolds in the rejection of the Messengers.
https://www.interfaith.org/community/threads/20812/page-2#post-383766 #34There is no Baha'i that can give interpretation on any of those scriptures ( we are able to do so, but only state it as a personal opinion). The Universal House of Justice can give guidance, but they also are not able to interpret ...
Clutching at strings there RJM.You are not permitted to interpret your own Baha'i writings but the Bible and other scriptures are fair game to be manipulated to try to justify Baha'u'llah's claims?
The keys have been given. If one reads what Baha'u'llah offered, then reads those scripture in that light, new frames of references are available, the Oneness of God is found.You know this how? You know next to nothing about them, by your own admission
But you have said -- and I can go back and find your statement if you like -- that nothing of the New Testament manipulation that you 'offer' is your own personal one? You only paste from.yiur Baha'i sources.personal interpretation in relation to the Baha'i Writings. Any past scriptures likewise, unless ther is an official Interpretation, in that case we can offer it as Official.
A lot I say would need clarification RJM, as I am not an essay writer, I try to keep it short and to the point.But you have said -- and I can go back and find your statement if you like -- that nothing of the New Testament manipulation that you 'offer' is your own personal one? You only paste from.yiur Baha'i sources.
But that's the point. How would you do this unless you have a reasonable knowledge of the New Testament or any other scripture? You just accept whatever you are told by Baha'u'llah and his family as true, without ever taking time to investigate other points of view.If I attempt other interpretation, I would offer that it is my personal interpretation.
Just a question RJM, for you to consider. Do you use the keys of understanding given by Christ when you read the Torah?But that's the point. How would you do this unless you have a reasonable knowledge of the New Testament or any other scripture? You just accept whatever you are told by Baha'u'llah and his family as true, without ever taking time to investigate other points of view.
You haven't read anything else -- not really properly -- and have no intention of doing so, by your own admission ... which is exactly your accusation against others concerning your own Baha'i beliefs
I get easily irritated by Christians trying to mine and manipulate the OT for obscure references to Jesus. As do Jews. I don't like it. Nor do I unquestioningly accept what Christian sources say.Just a question RJM, for you to consider. Do you use the keys of understanding given by Christ when you read the Torah?
Very much when you use the NT -- and other scriptures but particularly the NT -- to try to justify a new self-declared christ, which is the opposite of the intended meaning of the passages you paste from your Baha'i sources.You seem to be very concerned about what study I have done, does that really matter?
How can you expect to engage in interfaith discussion if you have no opinions of your own but only paste from your authorized material?am not going to discuss that anymore, as it is a distraction. Like discussing who has the best qualifications
Passing on what will bring about the unity of the entire human race, is well worth all the accusations that may arise RJM.@Tony Bristow-Stagg
No need to answer that. You have no interest in interfaith discussion which is the purpose of the forums -- just preaching, by your own admission
In your humble opinion.Very much when you use the NT -- and other scriptures but particularly the NT -- to try to justify a new self-declared christ, which is the opposite of the intended meaning of the passages you paste from your Baha'i sources.