Pathless
Fiercely Interdependent
So I've been thinking a lot about gender lately, and it seems to me that we've got some classical dichotomous thinking going on when most of us think about gender. What does it mean to be a man? A woman? Are there spaces in between? Is it possible for a biological to be more of a man than someone else who is biologically male, and if so, do you think that (s)he must then be a lesbian?
What do you think and how much with your biological "gender" do you identify, if you don't mind going there?
I've been doing a little research in this area for a while, and it is a topic that I am exploring more in depth. Particularly interesting to me is that in many Native American/Indian societies there were at least three genders. Currently I have just started a book that is all about this, what is called being a "berdache"--a label that was derogatorially applied by colonizers but has stuck. Berdaches, from what I understand at this point, were biological males who gravitated towards sterrotypically feminine roles. Some were homosexual and ended up in partnerships with other men. Many dressed as women. They were respected within indigenous cultures and mixed freely. Parents and other caregivers would identify a child who had these cross-gender leanings, and so these people were acknowledged and honored in their ways from early life. Often they were seen as "go-betweens" for women and men, as they had a foot in both worlds, and there is some indication that they were often quite spiritual.
Whaddaya think of that? I'm open to everyone's responses, although I am not looking for condemnations or dogma of any kind, please.![Smile :) :)]()
I've been doing a little research in this area for a while, and it is a topic that I am exploring more in depth. Particularly interesting to me is that in many Native American/Indian societies there were at least three genders. Currently I have just started a book that is all about this, what is called being a "berdache"--a label that was derogatorially applied by colonizers but has stuck. Berdaches, from what I understand at this point, were biological males who gravitated towards sterrotypically feminine roles. Some were homosexual and ended up in partnerships with other men. Many dressed as women. They were respected within indigenous cultures and mixed freely. Parents and other caregivers would identify a child who had these cross-gender leanings, and so these people were acknowledged and honored in their ways from early life. Often they were seen as "go-betweens" for women and men, as they had a foot in both worlds, and there is some indication that they were often quite spiritual.
Whaddaya think of that? I'm open to everyone's responses, although I am not looking for condemnations or dogma of any kind, please.