Stuff and nonsense. That is your own man-made interpretation to suit your own agenda. Consider:The Son of God, though, did not then go on to say, ‘and on you, Peter, I will build my congregation.’ No. He said, "on this rock-mass I will build my congregation." Since the subject under consideration was the identity of Jesus, the "rock-mass" must have been the one whom Peter acknowledged as "the Christ, the Son of the living God." In other words, Jesus was saying, ‘Upon the rock-mass, which you, Peter, confess, I will build my congregation.’
Matthew 16:18:
"And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it."
Now, we know the man's name was Simon bar Jonah, and here we have him named 'Peter', "Cephas, meaning 'rock' ... and it's upon that rock ... that is Peter ... that He will build His Church.
Not Jesus says "I will build my Church" ... on Peter, by implication ... which means the Petrine Church is Christ's Church ... all others are counterfeit.
Otherwise you are saying Jesus introduced 'cephas' as a purely spurious and meaningless point, the only possible reason being to render the Scriptures unintelligible ... why introduce the name 'rock' attached to Simon bar Jonah at all, if not to make a point that it is Peter on which the Church is founded?
+++
In fact Christ says these words in response to Peter's confession which, as Christ says, could only have been revealed by God. So Christ will build His Church on the Revelation given by God to Peter ...
Matthew 16:17
"Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but my Father who is in heaven."
Note Simon is blessed by God with this knowing ... so Jesus treats this as a signal of His Father's doing ... it is His Father's will ...
And the Apostles were the first to admit they often did not know or understand the implication of what He said to them.That the apostles did not understand Jesus’ statement to signify that Peter was the rock-mass is evident from the fact that they later disputed about who seemed to be the greatest among them. (Mr 9:33-35; Lu 22:24-26) There would have been no basis for such disputing had Peter been given the primacy as the rock-mass on which the congregation was to be built.
Well clearly they do not as it is evident in Acts and the Epistles that Peter was considered 'first amongst equals' ...The Scriptures clearly show that as foundation stones, all the apostles are equal.
Of course, it is Our Lord's Church after all, it does not belong to them, it was entrusted to Peter, and to them.All of them, including Peter, rest upon Christ Jesus as the foundation cornerstone.
Thomas