N
Nick_A
Guest
Hi All
I see there is a thread here on the Transcendent Unity of Religions so rather then hijack it with my question, I'll begin a separate thread. I'd like to get your opinion about this growing question of mine concerning the connection between the Transcendental Unity of Religions and Interfaith.
I've learned by experience that many people that espouse tolerance as a core value of Interfaith are themselves extremely intolerant. My experiences with this intolerance suggests it has one primary cause: the natural results of celebrating the human condition. Interfaith seems to suggest that we are all wonderful beings but have gone wrong and have adopted some misconceptions that can be cleared up logically and through group participation validating the assertion of how wonderful we are. This is the essence of Humanism. Given the chance, the human condition will become other than what it is.
However, I take the Transcendent unity of religions seriously. It accepts my belief that we are asleep to reality as suggested by Plato's cave analogy, The Buddhist Parable of the burning House, and by Jesus saying that the World must hate the teaching of awakening to re-birth.
I have learned that there is nothing more hated then expressing this opinion within secular interfaith. Instead of asserting how wonderful everyone is, this point of view asserts our nothingness in relation to the human potential for awakening to reality. Defending this concept of our collective nothingness is considered having a bad attitude.
Where secular Interfaith seems to begin with how wonderful we are, Transcendent Interfaith begins with the humility of admitting the human condition of being psychologically asleep and in opposition to ourselves. St. Paul described this condition in himself as the "Wretched Man."
I've found that this attitude suggesting everyone's psychological impotence is just not acceptable to fundamentalist secular Interfaith.
Here is a good diagram describing the Transcendent Unity of Religions:
On The Transcendent Unity of Religions
Religious conflict and secular Humanism are all on the exoteric level. Because of the divided nature of human "being." Regardless of all the fine speeches and platitudes we will continue to be collectively expressions of what we ARE. This means we are capable of both the greatest compassion and the greatest atrocities.
The problem is that it is too insulting to admit the human condition for secular fundamentalist Interfaith so it becomes intolerant of it while considering it the results of a bad attitude.
Next year is the centennial year of Simone Weil's birth and I hope to be involved in discussions on the depth of her life and thought. One such question I hope to explore are these two quotations. They suggest that secular Interfaith by itself doesn't lead to its desired goals. What is required is Transcendent Interfaith that begins with admitting the human condition and respecting and sharing on the esoteric paths that lead towards the same transcendent realities:
I've had first had experience with the nastiness secular Interfaith is capable of towards this necessarily ego deflating concept. I also know that it is essential that more people come to consider this question as an alternative in the light of a materialistic society.
I see there is a thread here on the Transcendent Unity of Religions so rather then hijack it with my question, I'll begin a separate thread. I'd like to get your opinion about this growing question of mine concerning the connection between the Transcendental Unity of Religions and Interfaith.
I've learned by experience that many people that espouse tolerance as a core value of Interfaith are themselves extremely intolerant. My experiences with this intolerance suggests it has one primary cause: the natural results of celebrating the human condition. Interfaith seems to suggest that we are all wonderful beings but have gone wrong and have adopted some misconceptions that can be cleared up logically and through group participation validating the assertion of how wonderful we are. This is the essence of Humanism. Given the chance, the human condition will become other than what it is.
However, I take the Transcendent unity of religions seriously. It accepts my belief that we are asleep to reality as suggested by Plato's cave analogy, The Buddhist Parable of the burning House, and by Jesus saying that the World must hate the teaching of awakening to re-birth.
I have learned that there is nothing more hated then expressing this opinion within secular interfaith. Instead of asserting how wonderful everyone is, this point of view asserts our nothingness in relation to the human potential for awakening to reality. Defending this concept of our collective nothingness is considered having a bad attitude.
Where secular Interfaith seems to begin with how wonderful we are, Transcendent Interfaith begins with the humility of admitting the human condition of being psychologically asleep and in opposition to ourselves. St. Paul described this condition in himself as the "Wretched Man."
I've found that this attitude suggesting everyone's psychological impotence is just not acceptable to fundamentalist secular Interfaith.
Here is a good diagram describing the Transcendent Unity of Religions:
On The Transcendent Unity of Religions
Religious conflict and secular Humanism are all on the exoteric level. Because of the divided nature of human "being." Regardless of all the fine speeches and platitudes we will continue to be collectively expressions of what we ARE. This means we are capable of both the greatest compassion and the greatest atrocities.
The problem is that it is too insulting to admit the human condition for secular fundamentalist Interfaith so it becomes intolerant of it while considering it the results of a bad attitude.
Next year is the centennial year of Simone Weil's birth and I hope to be involved in discussions on the depth of her life and thought. One such question I hope to explore are these two quotations. They suggest that secular Interfaith by itself doesn't lead to its desired goals. What is required is Transcendent Interfaith that begins with admitting the human condition and respecting and sharing on the esoteric paths that lead towards the same transcendent realities:
"Humanism was not wrong in thinking that truth, beauty, liberty, and equality are of infinite value, but in thinking that man can get them for himself without grace." Simone Weil
"The combination of these two facts – the longing in the depth of the heart for absolute good, and the power, though only latent, of directing attention and love to a reality beyond the world and of receiving good from it – constitutes a link which attaches every man without exception to that other reality. Whoever recognizes that reality recognizes that link. Because of it, he holds every human being without any exception as something sacred to which he is bound to show respect. This is the only possible motive for universal respect towards all human beings." Simone Weil
“Draft for A Statement of Human Obligations” SIMONE WEIL, AN ANTHOLOGY ed. Sian Miles
It is a natural tendency for secular Interfaith which glorifies our imagined self importance to be intolerant of Transcendent Interfaith which begins with the realization of the above mentioned human condition.
I've had first had experience with the nastiness secular Interfaith is capable of towards this necessarily ego deflating concept. I also know that it is essential that more people come to consider this question as an alternative in the light of a materialistic society.
How then to proceed without getting shot, boiled in oil, or falling victim to similar delights of those suffering righteous indignation? It seems that being truthful is essential but simultaneously, the worst thing a person can do.
How then to proceed? Any thoughts?