jiii said:
My question is especially interested in the thoughts of any British visitors to this thread, but also to anyone that has an idea to add. The question is general, and thus may be difficult to address thoroughly, but I'm interested in hearing what others think.
America, having gained independence from England only a few hundred years ago, would seem to be very similar, and yet at the same time, recognizably different from it's old mother land. My question follows:
In what fundamental ways do Britain and the English differ from America and the Americans (and vice versa)?
By this, I am especially looking for insights into general psychology, the subtleties of culture, and basic attitudes toward life. Although a good deal of pages could be filled with the quite trivial and incidental ways in which Britain differs from America, I am looking for some deeper perspectives that go beyond just apparent differences (ex. the fact that both carry different accents is not the kind of thing I think we need to expound upon...it's pretty obvious).
I got to thinking about this because I live in what is still very commonly referred to by Americans as "New England"...it makes me wonder just how different "New England" is from, well, not "Old England" but the original England. Commentary need not be limited by this, though.
Your thoughts?
Here is a common denominator, called by a different name. The British have a reputation for keeping a "Stiff upper lip". Keeping tight and stoic in a tough situation. Apparently that has rubbed off on the American pychy as well, though it is referred to as hanging tough, or can-do attitude. But I submit, that not only the United States is directly affected by Britian, but Canada and Australia as well (not to leave out New Zealand)
The US has Constitutional Law, which is similar to British Common Law. However there are differences (mostly as of late in the American life to date), and relatively minor.
The United States American, does seem to have a decidedly more independant/stubborn streak that many take for arrogance. However, I believe that comes from ancestors driving the point home that we are born with nothing, therefore we must go out and earn our way, because no one is going to help unless they see a determined effort, and that may only be a lucky break. I'm not so certain that that is a good thing all the time...Katrina comes immediately to mind. Help was offered by people all over the world, including some of the most unlikely of countries, and we thanked them, but declined for the most part.
There is also a general mindset against (in the United States) "owing" someone (I'm not talking about money). No favors, no assistance, we don't like it. On the other hand, we have a tendency as a nation to forgive, or forget a debt owed by others to us. Britian is not so quick to let go of markers.
It most likely is due to the country being built by immigrants who came to start fresh and sever all but familial ties with their countries of origin. Think about it. Americans are quite quick to identify themselves as "Irish American", or Italian American, and so on. Familial ties are held close. But no one says, "I'm a decendant of the British Empire, or the Soviet Union, or the Franco Monarchy".
If one thinks about it, the United States comprises of 50 united nation states, under one common federal law and government, one common language, but containing 50 seperate State laws and governments, with people from all walks and nations contained therein, that differ from state to state. But we aren't really comfortable with saying, "I'm a Michigander, or a New Jersian, or New Yorker (well ok, maybe New York has no problems with it)", most of the time its "I'm from Michigan, or from Texas, or Oaklahoma, or Washington", but I'm an American, is the standard identifier. There are exceptions to the rule, particularly with people who may be indigenous to the area they hail from (such as the true 10,000 remaining Hawaiians, or the Chamorans of Guam, or the Puerto Ricans, or Aleuts of Alaska).
I don't think the citizens of Great Britian, for example are so cohesive in their declaration of who they are. British citizen, yes. But I'm Welsh, or I''m Scottish, or I'm English, seems to be the common identifiers.
I know the Canadians are not so tight about National identifiers. I'm not so certain about Australia, but it seams New Zealanders hold the same national identity, that Americans do.
I also note that United States citizens call themselves by the entirety of the continent on which they live (or are in proximity to). And it seems to be something that everyone world wide accepts and understands, even by those who live in other parts of the American continent...which I find very interesting. Last time I noted that in history was Rome...
Finally, it has been said that America and England have everything in common, but a language...that may be quite true, down on the streets, and in the comparative mindsets. Of course to be "knocked up" in the United States often is considered "A wake up call..."
my thoughts
v/r
Q