There is no such thing as 'Free Will'

Discussion in 'Christianity' started by Azure24, Jan 3, 2008.

  1. juantoo3

    juantoo3 ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,124
    Likes Received:
    420
    I did post this in another thread, and it must be meant that I found it. I forgot I wrote it.

     
  2. rodgertutt

    rodgertutt Interfaith Forums

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you were to read the links I think you would find them apologetical and not "recruiting or proseytising."

    If I knew how, I would do that. But I don't know how.
     
  3. Quahom1

    Quahom1 What was the question?

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,906
    Likes Received:
    5
    I apologize. I was out of line.

    v/r

    Q
     
  4. rodgertutt

    rodgertutt Interfaith Forums

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Everything is always going as God intends.
    C.S. Lewis wrote, "The greatest surprise for Satan will occur when he learns that he has been perfectly doing the will of God all the time.
    I agree with that.

    No one is ever out of God's will.
    It is God's decretive will (that which MUST occur) that because we are all sinners by nature and cannot help but sin (which means miss the mark) because we are spiritually "dead in trespasses and sin," we ALL will violate His preceptive (not perceptive) will e.g. THE GOLDEN RULE (that which we OUGHT to do) as much as we actually do. See Romans 3:10-18 which is the condition of everyone without exception.

    I believe that God justly imposes accountability on everyone even though they cannot help but do what they do, because through His intimate sovereign control of how far He lets everyone get involved in sinning and suffering (until He intervenes for each one by His sovereign grace) God is going to manifest, and glorify, and magnify the many facets of His character in a way that is uniquely applied to each individual.

    Contrary to what many people think, this does not cause us to live careless sinful lives because we love, and very much want to please a God like this.

    I believe that God will eventually fit every unique individual into His master plan in a positive way that necessitates their unique temporary involvement in evil and suffering that will enable God to manifest, and glorify, and magnify the many facets of His character in a way that uniquely involves that person, and everyone else involved in that person’s life too.

    Then, after God has finished using evil and suffering for the reasons why He allowed them to temporarily exist, He will eradicate them from existence.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 28, 2010
  5. Quahom1

    Quahom1 What was the question?

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,906
    Likes Received:
    5
    But Lewis was speaking "of" Angels. Man is an unknown, and a delight to God because of his unknown nature. It's like God blinded himself to what Man might or might not do...odd, I agree...non the less, one for consideration...

    We are a little "lower" than angels, but one day we will judge over them. Would you or would you not agree?
     
  6. rodgertutt

    rodgertutt Interfaith Forums

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree because of Psalm 8:5, and Hebews 2:7&9
     
  7. rodgertutt

    rodgertutt Interfaith Forums

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Something else to consider.

    The steps of a good man are ordered by the Lord, and He delighteth in his way. Psam 37:23

    The word "good" was added by the translators.
    It was not in the original text.

    I believe that God will eventually fit every unique individual into His master plan in a positive way that necessitates their unique temporary involvement in evil and suffering that will enable God to manifest, and glorify, and magnify the many facets of His character in a way that uniquely involves that person, and everyone else involved in that person’s life too.

    Then, after God has finished using evil and suffering for the reasons why He allowed them to temporarily exist, He will eradicate them from existence.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 28, 2010
  8. rodgertutt

    rodgertutt Interfaith Forums

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is right —it really is— that men should do awful things that they might experience awful consequences (viz., sin, guilt, shame and suffering); for God has need of just such creatures as those who have known these very experiences and in the very varieties as those with which we are acquainted.

    In light of the fact that God is operating all (Eph. 1:11), it becomes evident that this is so. God is by no means operating all according to the whims of caprice, but according to the counsel of His will. We live, move, and have our being, for the sake of God’s own purpose (1Cor. 8:6).

    The eventual end result for everyone will be glorious.
    APOLOGETICAL LINK
    THE OUTCOME OF INFINITE GRACE – Dr. Loyal Hurley
    http://www.tentmaker.org/books/infinitegrace.htm
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2010
  9. juantoo3

    juantoo3 ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,124
    Likes Received:
    420
    I took the liberty of editing links from a couple of your last posts as you have already posted those links repeatedly. I don't recognize this last one and will let it stand for the moment.

    I do appreciate you making an effort to discuss this rather than what you were doing before.

    I would ask one simple question for you to consider, an answer here is not necessary.

    If this were a matter that G-d wanted you to clearly understand, wouldn't this stuff just stick to your brain and come to you naturally and flow out like a wellspring without everybody else's material?

    Again, no one here needs the answer. The answer to the question is for you. :)
     
  10. rodgertutt

    rodgertutt Interfaith Forums

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2006
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    0
    Everything I know I have learned from someone else.
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2010
  11. shawn

    shawn New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,085
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks juan.
    I like to hear all kinds of points of view as it is mentally stimulating, but repetition which becomes excessive which is a blanket answer for all questions is way out of line.
    So thanks for stepping in and maybe, thereby, an old dog can learn some new tricks;)
    The only time someone is too old to learn something new is when they are dead.
     
  12. Marsh

    Marsh Disagreeable By Nature

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2004
    Messages:
    577
    Likes Received:
    0
    No sir, you're not getting off that easy. I pointed out a serious flaw in your reasoning, and you reply to me with an undocumented quotation?

    For the love of God, will you please just admit that you don't know what you're talking about? You already told Q that you don't know how to express your own words. If you truly knew what you were talking about, you'd find a way.

    Q, you were in no way out of line. This is intellectual Darwinism in action-- a true JS Mills test of merit in action, and from what I can see, the ideas expressed by Rodger are going the way of the Dodo bird.

    Rodger, since you are the one making the assertion, the burden of proof is on YOU to prove your assertion, not on US to prove it's not true. You have a responsibility to either prove your assertion (you, by the strength of your own ideas based on your own understanding, not simply quoting somebody else who you may or may not fully understand). If you cannot do so, please have the courtesy of admitting that what you're saying isn't necessarily true.
     
  13. citizenzen

    citizenzen Custom User Title

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    2
    I find it really interesting is that this thread has gone on for over 1,000 posts. What is it about an old man repeating the same message over and over that is so fascinating? I guarantee you, if he were capable of a normal discussion, this thread would have been over long ago. He would have had his say, we would have had ours and that would be that. But for some reason his inability to articulate his message or engage in debate has given this thread bizarre and incredible longevity.

    I wonder why? It is curious.

    I think it's a little of the old sword-in-the-stone appeal.

    [king]"Who can break this man of his stubborn and naive beliefs? He who can accomplish it shall have my daughter's hand and shall rule my kingdom!"[/king]

    And we all line up and give it a pull, only to eventually leave, befuddled that someone could be so obstinate and jejune. It is hard to pass up a challenge. And it's hard to believe he can be that dense. One more pull... then he'll see the light.

    Wait... okay... one more pull. AAARRRrrrrrrggg!

    One more pull. NNNNnnNnnnnnnnggggghhh!

    One more pull...

    Any other theories?
     
  14. juantoo3

    juantoo3 ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,124
    Likes Received:
    420
    That is probably true of everybody, but it evades the point.

    If this material is yours, and it is of G-d, don't you think you should be able to respond freely in your own words (or as the spirit moves you) without resorting to repetition?

    Again, the answer is unimportant to anybody else, merely something for you to consider.
     
  15. juantoo3

    juantoo3 ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,124
    Likes Received:
    420
    LOL! I think you got it CZ. :D

    My bad was in not looking before I leapt, I've been away for a bit. To his credit Roger is not responsible for the entire 1000 posts, this was started a couple years ago by someone else, to whom I responded way back then. I kinda doubt Roger took any time to read it from the beginning tho'.

    P.S., for Roger's benefit, my arguments have not changed either, but I can express them in a wide variety of ways as the need suits. I am also open to considering those points where I might possibly be mistaken, but I have usually spent considerable thought before I ever come to any conclusion.
     
  16. juantoo3

    juantoo3 ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,124
    Likes Received:
    420
    Hey Marsh! It's been awhile, how's things your way?

    I suspect Roger will likely keep a deathgrip on what he feels is some profound mysterious truth in spite of any logical persuasions.

    But then, this is the kind of stuff that drives Christianity into all sorts of denominations, is it not?
     
  17. citizenzen

    citizenzen Custom User Title

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    2
    I think this is a key point. It's because we're able to express ourselves that we're able of demonstrate that our beliefs are reasonable (as reasonable as faith can be).

    But Rodger hasn't been able to present his case in a reasonable or logical manner. So we are enticed to respond in the vain hope that a rational argument would have impact.

    I just find it interesting and counterintuitive to find that being a poor conversationalist can actually promote conversation.

    Sometimes life just doesn't make sense. :D
     
  18. juantoo3

    juantoo3 ʎʇıɹoɥʇnɐ uoıʇsǝnb

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,124
    Likes Received:
    420
    Good point.

    I think we tend to take exception to those that feel the need to shout from rooftops...with bullhorns...as if volume or repetition somehow confer legitimacy. Eh...

    Goodness knows I've voiced thoughts that were not well received before, but at least I have the presence of mind (or at least I hope so) to know when I am not being received and move along...
     
  19. Quahom1

    Quahom1 What was the question?

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2003
    Messages:
    9,906
    Likes Received:
    5
    Sir, that is not true.
    The steps of a good man are ordered by the Lord, and He delighteth in his way. Psam 37:23
    The term "Good" was translated from the Greek word equivelent "Piused". Nothing was added. What else is a piused man but "good"? Unless your intent is to equate Pius with the Pope called "Pius XII" and the "Holocaust" instead of its original intent...?
     
  20. seattlegal

    seattlegal Mercuræn Buddhist

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    6,702
    Likes Received:
    151
    Blue Letter Bible - Lexicon
    The Hebrew reads "geber" or able bodied man, strong man, like the "mighty ones" in Genesis 6:4
     

Share This Page