S
soleil10
Guest
Traditionally, within religion there have been two categories or types of religious memberships. The contemplative and the religious layman (having a family). The role of the contemplative has been separated from the role of one that raises a family.
The "highest" role of spiritual practitioner was afforded to the celibate monk, priest etc.. while the layperson with a family was typically a follower of such a religious person..
We may also individually go and do "religious" church work or do "spiritual practice" at home but then we see our other activities as "wordly" and "mundane".
I suggest that we sould not divide the sacred from any aspect of our lives
When we breathe, when we walk, when we listen to a bird'song or when "potty train" our child, we should transform it to be a serious and authentic "religious", spiritual experience.
We should expand the definition of "spiritual, religious practice" and live in complete union and communion with God by experiencing the presence of God in all our daily activities.
What do you think ?
The "highest" role of spiritual practitioner was afforded to the celibate monk, priest etc.. while the layperson with a family was typically a follower of such a religious person..
We may also individually go and do "religious" church work or do "spiritual practice" at home but then we see our other activities as "wordly" and "mundane".
I suggest that we sould not divide the sacred from any aspect of our lives
When we breathe, when we walk, when we listen to a bird'song or when "potty train" our child, we should transform it to be a serious and authentic "religious", spiritual experience.
We should expand the definition of "spiritual, religious practice" and live in complete union and communion with God by experiencing the presence of God in all our daily activities.
What do you think ?