Go back and read your posts, you included Christians..
I have stated this..........
<<Well, if you read my earlier posts , you can see some verses from the quran where killing, physical torture, crucifixion,mutilation is sanctioned.
I have never read about Jesus or any other prophet, talking about physical torture(chopping off ones fingers, hands and legs) and mutilation.
True, the Christians did indulge in murder and other heinous activities, but unlike the quran, this has not been sanctioned by Jesus, who clearly abhorred all violence.
I am not a Christian, but this is my objective observation.>>>>
And I stand by what I have said.
So you complain if nothing is done and you complain if something is done.
..
As I said, the monarchy in saudi arabia is threatened by alqaeda and hence its orders to the police and armed forces to target it. Also orders from Bush is also there.
It is not because Saudi arabian monarchy is concerned about islamic terrorism( otherwise they would not have aided the taliban. ).Their only concern is their own survival and when it comes to it, they are ruthless in ensuring it.
So it is okay to behave badly if you are drunk.

..
Definetely not, and that is why he was arrested and prosecuted. We don't believe in sparing anyone, high or low , who have committed crimes.
What I find so interesting is that I accept Islamic terrorism as a fact and I condemn it yet this man killed over 25,000 people and he is a hero of yours.
..
You will find stuff like he killed 25,000 people only in propaganda machinery like sikh wiki encyclopedia, which is run by sikh extremist propagandists.
He definetely have not killed civilians except sikh terrorists. And as I mentioned , these sikh terrorists, trained and equipped by islamic pakistan, themselves killed thousands of innocent sikhs and hindus in punjab. And if it wasn't for the sikh K.P.S.Gill and other valiant and heroic sikhs , the death toll would have been much more higher. Gill crushed sikh terrorism in Punjab with an iron hand, as a result of which violence in Punjab is non-existent at the moment. All these sikh extremist cowards , who were thrashed by Gill even in spite of the fact that these extremists possessed sophisticated weapons in comparison to the not so sophisticated police weapons, is now intent on maligning Gill through propaganda, when all people in India know the truth about Gill. Gill was indeed a tough and ruthless and machiavellian man when it comes to terrorism, and perhaps some excesses were indeed committed by him, but we are very grateful to him for bringing justice to the thousands of sikhs and hindus killed by sikh terrorists, for crushing sikh terrorism permanently in punjab and bringing peace over there, and for preventing the deaths of numerous other potential victims, which could have happened had he not been there.
I knew you would get around to blaming the Muslims for your own attrocities as well as ours...
What I have stated is facts. The sikh terrorists indeed were trained by the ISI of islamic pakistan, which neighbours Punjab, and their sophisticated weapons are indeed easily obtained in Pakistan and Afghanistan, unlike in Punjab or India. And captured sikh terrorists themselves during interrogation have confirmed this.This is shown by my links as well. It is all very logical.
If you want to deny this in spite of this, it all casts light on your state of mind.
I wish to emphasize again. Sikh terrorism would not have taken place in such a way, if Pakistan had not trained and armed sikh terrorists. Islamic pakistan clearly has the blood of thousands of sikh and hindu victims of sikh militancy on their head.
Look at the date, it was in 1999, long after the caste system was banned, and I only posted 2 of a huge list of such awful things. Perhaps you should read more about what is happening to your own people before you start on at the rest of the world. I am not defending any rapist, all rapists should be given a death sentence but please don't go on about rape when it is common place in your own country (by non Muslims)..
We definetely have strong laws in our country against sexual abuse and rape against anyone. Many idiotic uppercaste hindus who have committed discrimination against others , even for trivial reasons, have been arrested and prosecuted and made an example of . Our newspapers are quick to pounce on any upper-caste discrimination and bring it to the attention of the public.
Just recently , an upper -caste person, who discriminated against some dalit hindu students in Maharashtra , was immediately arrested and prosecuted. He lost his job as well.
The Indian government and hindu spiritual organisations have done a very good job of uplifting the shudra and the dalits.
The lions share of jobs in the public sector , seats in medical and engineering and other colleges, are reserved for the dalits and shudras.
This is not there for the upper-castes. The government has also introduced many measures to empower the dalits and shudras in rural areas.As a result of all of these the shudras have come up very rapidly in Indian society in terms of affluence and education and influence. We have had a dalit president , chief ministers, ministers, MPs, MlAs, and other leaders.
Numerous hindu organisations are also working for the upliftment of the dalits.
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar has stated that 80% of the students in the educational institutions he has created , are dalits.
We also have a dalit enlightened female master in Mata Amritanandamayi, who is amazingly popular in India and all over the world. It is a common sight to see upper caste men and women lowering themselves at her feet in humility and reverence and implementing her teachings of helping others in need.
Life and Philosophy of the Mata Amritanandamayi, Affectionately called Amma by Her Followers
Mata Amritanandamayi - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It is also not sanctioned by the Quran and is illegal in all countries but does that stop it? ..
Yeah sure, and what about rape of the women captives of the unbelievers ?
Terrorism is not sanctioned by the Quran but does that stop it?..
And what about the chopping of the fingers , limbs , crucifixion, harshness to the unbeliever and imposition of the jizya tax on him.
Show me one verse in the Quran that sanctions rape - in fact just show me one line of one verse that sanctions rape in the Quran. Go on post one I dare you. I will wait here for a year until you have to come back and admit there is no such verse.

Stop spreading lies about the Quran. Say all you like about Muslims and terrorism but if you are going to say such awful things about the Quran you had better be able to back it up.
With pleasure ( and disgust).
Check this out......
The Islamic legal manual ‘Umdat al-Salik, which carries the endorsement of Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, stipulates: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” Why? So that they are free to become the concubines of their captors. The Qur’an permits Muslim men to have intercourse with their wives and their slave girls: “Forbidden to you are ... married women, except those whom you own as slaves” (Sura 4:23-24).
After one successful battle, Muhammad tells his men, “Go and take any slave girl.” He took one for himself also. After the notorious massacre of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe, he did it again. According to his earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad “went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for [the men of Banu Qurayza] and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches.” After killing “600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900,” the Prophet of Islam took one of the widows he had just made, Rayhana bint Amr, as another concubine.
Emerging victorious in another battle, according to a generally accepted Islamic tradition, Muhammad’s men present him with an ethical question: “We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl [coitus interruptus] with them.” Muhammad told them: “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.’” When Muhammad says “it is better that you should not do it,” he’s referring to coitus interruptus, not to raping their captives. He takes that for granted.
Jihad Watch: Spencer on rape and jihad
“Forbidden to you are ... married women, except those whom you own as slaves” (Sura 4:23-24).
"Prohibited to you (For marriage) are:- Your mothers, daughters, sisters; father's sisters, Mother's sisters; brother's daughters, sister's daughters; foster-mothers (Who gave you suck), foster-sisters; your wives' mothers; your step-daughters under your guardianship, born of your wives to whom ye have gone in,- no prohibition if ye have not gone in;- (Those who have been) wives of your sons proceeding from your loins; and two sisters in wedlock at one and the same time, except for what is past; for God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful;-
Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath God ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and God is All-knowing, All-wise. (The Noble Quran, 4:23-24)"
FROM THE QURAN - 70:22-30
"Not so the worshippers, who are steadfast in prayer, who set aside a due portion of their wealth for the beggar and for the deprived, who truly believe in the Day of Reckoning and dread the punishment of their Lord (for none is secure from the punishment of their Lord); who restrain their carnal desire (save with their wives and their slave girls, for these are lawful to them: he that lusts after other than these is a transgressor..."
This verse shows that Muslim men were allowed to have sex with their wives (of course) and their slave girls.
FROM THE QURAN - 23:5,6
"...who restrain their carnal desires (except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them..."
Again, Muslim men were allowed to have sexual relations with their wives and slave girls.
FROM THE QURAN - 4:24
"And all married women are forbidden unto you save those captives whom your right hand possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. (Muhammad Pickthall's English translation of the Quran).
This verse is one verse out of a long passage dealing with who Muslim men can marry or have sexual relations with. The phrase "captives whom your right hand possess", means the slave girls Muslim men own.
Note also that this passage deals with more than just marriage. In Sahih Muslim volume 2, #3432, the background context for this Quranic verse is given. It relates to the events at Autus, and it permitted the Muslim men to have sex with their female slaves.
FROM THE QURAN - 33:50
"Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty;..."
<SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'MS Mincho'"><SPAN style="mso-tab-count: 1">
And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts from illegal sexual acts). Except with their wives and the (women slaves and captives) whom their right hand possess,--for (then) they are not to be blamed.” Surah 70:29-30